No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
Been about 12 or 14 years since I was on it. Looked rickety then. Anybody in or near ST Louis I keep expecting the I70 bridge to fall apart. I see The I55 bridge at Memphis is open again. IMO the I70 bridge at St Louis is in worse shape. I quit crossing it.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108010 03/26/2405:59 AM03/26/2405:59 AM
Just saw a longer video posted by Andy Ngo on Twitter. Theres a half dozen or so vehicles that cross the bridge just prior to the strike. The ship looks like it turned too soon as it wasnt driving straight at the bridge. I would wonder if it was a autopilot/autonav error.
Here is a different perspective. The ship seems to have a total loss of power. Then the power comes back on, and you can see dark smoke come pouring out of one of the stacks as the pilot tries to maneuver and add power I would assume. They then lose power again and it comes back on again right before they hit the bridge.
Eh...wot?
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108103 03/26/2409:21 AM03/26/2409:21 AM
Surely wouldnt take that long to clear it if they really wanted to? I would think with a big enough ship or three they could drag most of it out of the channel where they could cut it up and remove later
That video makes it look like the ship made a glancing blow to the bridge footer (hard turn to starboard and loss of power), passed the bridge upright, then backed up into it a second time. A bit suspicious for sure.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: k snow]
#8108123 03/26/2410:00 AM03/26/2410:00 AM
That video makes it look like the ship made a glancing blow to the bridge footer (hard turn to starboard and loss of power), passed the bridge upright, then backed up into it a second time. A bit suspicious for sure.
I keep seeing people say that but its clear that there wasnt any backing up. You arent stopping that beast, backing it up and slamming into the bridge in the amount of time seen in the video. Might of been a bit of bounce back but it was on full send.
That video makes it look like the ship made a glancing blow to the bridge footer (hard turn to starboard and loss of power), passed the bridge upright, then backed up into it a second time. A bit suspicious for sure.
I keep seeing people say that but its clear that there wasnt any backing up. You arent stopping that beast, backing it up and slamming into the bridge in the amount of time seen in the video. Might of been a bit of bounce back but it was on full send.
I see that now, not sure why my brain saw it the other way. Definitely full send into the bridge.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108127 03/26/2410:04 AM03/26/2410:04 AM
Looks like power loss, if I remember right on a ship of that size if they went into reverse they could shear the screws off, so probably trying to power forward to push it into the shipping lane and try to clear the bridge.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108149 03/26/2410:37 AM03/26/2410:37 AM
Looks to me like a boat that was already going too fast coming out of harbor, then at last moment, poured on the coal to pick up speed, then turned to starboard, lined up on bridge and stayed there until it hit. Looks pretty deliberate to me.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108161 03/26/2410:56 AM03/26/2410:56 AM
I just heard the same thing SNIPERBBB; the ship issued a Mayday shortly before the accident and the workers on the bridge were able to stop all traffic. Six of eight construction workers are still missing according to the report I just read.
Eh...wot?
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Lugnut]
#8108185 03/26/2411:33 AM03/26/2411:33 AM
Here is a different perspective. The ship seems to have a total loss of power. Then the power comes back on, and you can see dark smoke come pouring out of one of the stacks as the pilot tries to maneuver and add power I would assume. They then lose power again and it comes back on again right before they hit the bridge.
you can see the lights go out 2x it was coming in fast with no power then the power comes in they appear to try to turn then crash
I suspect we will see a 3 tug escort and a local pilot on the bridge of these ships in the future.
it is just way to easy for a ship this size to take out a major peice of infrastructure like a bridge to trust it to anything less.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108198 03/26/2411:50 AM03/26/2411:50 AM
Supposedly that ship has been plagued with power failure issues, and I seriously doubt it was deliberate, there would have been an American pilot on board.
Once those things are moving you ain't stopping it with a fast maneuver, in fact it looks like they almost missed that column in spite of the momentum.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108200 03/26/2411:53 AM03/26/2411:53 AM
Anyone know the state of the tide when it was coming down river?
That can add or subtract depending but whatever the state the vessel needs to be making headway to maintain control. Otherwise you're just going where the water takes you.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108239 03/26/2412:48 PM03/26/2412:48 PM
If it’s intertidal they would probably time their departure to work with the tides, which are fairly big right now due to a full moon. Pilot would be on the bridge and hopefully the helmsman understands English. Crew on watch should all be on standby at stations prepared for such emergencies as loss of power and/or steering. Perhaps River Birch will chime in here-he would have some good insight
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: 3 Fingers]
#8108272 03/26/2401:29 PM03/26/2401:29 PM
By time of year that river should have the max water coming down so there's current.
warrior, it is intertidal there, last hour of ebb tide so 1 to 2 kts I expect.
Originally Posted by 3 Fingers
Pilot would be on the bridge and hopefully the helmsman understands English. Crew on watch should all be on standby at stations prepared for such emergencies as loss of power and/or steering.
Definitely had a Chesapeake Bay pilot and maybe a harbor pilot as well. Ship crew may or may not understand English but must have an interpreter on board to relay commands.
A distracted bay pilot let one ship run hard aground just outside the river couple years ago, took months to get it off.
What everybody misses is the wind effect on a ship pilied up with containers....they act like a sail...no rudder response and you go where the wind and tide take you.
Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108276 03/26/2401:32 PM03/26/2401:32 PM
By time of year that river should have the max water coming down so there's current.
warrior, it is intertidal there, last hour of ebb tide so 1 to 2 kts I expect.
Originally Posted by 3 Fingers
Pilot would be on the bridge and hopefully the helmsman understands English. Crew on watch should all be on standby at stations prepared for such emergencies as loss of power and/or steering.
Definitely had a Chesapeake Bay pilot and maybe a harbor pilot as well. Ship crew may or may not understand English but must have an interpreter on board to relay commands.
A distracted bay pilot let one ship run hard aground just outside the river couple years ago, took months to get it off.
What everybody misses is the wind effect on a ship pilied up with containers....they act like a sail...no rudder response and you go where the wind and tide take you.
Low tide was 0200, so.shouldnt have been much. I saw calculation of force of a 3 mph wind, perpindicular, on Square footage of that ship/ sea cans, and perpendicular, But reported wind was about 0.
Looks like they dropped starboard anchor right before.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108293 03/26/2402:08 PM03/26/2402:08 PM
By time of year that river should have the max water coming down so there's current.
warrior, it is intertidal there, last hour of ebb tide so 1 to 2 kts I expect.
Originally Posted by 3 Fingers
Pilot would be on the bridge and hopefully the helmsman understands English. Crew on watch should all be on standby at stations prepared for such emergencies as loss of power and/or steering.
Definitely had a Chesapeake Bay pilot and maybe a harbor pilot as well. Ship crew may or may not understand English but must have an interpreter on board to relay commands.
A distracted bay pilot let one ship run hard aground just outside the river couple years ago, took months to get it off.
What everybody misses is the wind effect on a ship pilied up with containers....they act like a sail...no rudder response and you go where the wind and tide take you.
Thank you very much!
wanna be goat farmer.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108340 03/26/2403:47 PM03/26/2403:47 PM
I wouldn't know as I avoid that entire craphole area. Last time I was there I went under it while on the R/V Aquarius with Martin O'Berry as Captn.
LOL, was on same, with same, over 40.years ago. Went other direction though.
Fuzzy memories, cutting a deck at $5 a pop, high card wins, Cape Charles USGS station. Hung over as I'd even been next morning, just in time for HORRENDOUS seas....
Last edited by DaveP; 03/26/2407:42 PM.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108519 03/26/2407:38 PM03/26/2407:38 PM
Drop an anchor from the bow and it’s just gonna swing the stern around. If far enough away from the bridge it could’ve stopped them in time . Channel looks to be at perfect right angle to the bridge
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: trapdog1]
#8108609 03/26/2409:21 PM03/26/2409:21 PM
When I was a kid we would build houses on the living room floor with playing cards. Take 2 cards and make a triangle house and kinda keep adding more little 2 card triangles to it and we’d see how high we could build them. Then someone would walk by and the little gust of wind would knock the whole house down just like that! Anyways, that’s what that bridge falling down reminded me of.
Cold as ice!
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108690 03/26/2410:51 PM03/26/2410:51 PM
Had a bridge fall into the Mississippi around 30 years ago. Was from a defunct RR line. Took em close to a year and half to decide then cut it into 3 pieces with explosive charges. By that time there were over 90 barges stacked up waiting. Nothing compared to the magnitude of this in comparison.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108765 03/27/2405:29 AM03/27/2405:29 AM
Build a bridge where there is boat traffic sooner or later one will hit it. When the whole thing collapses after its a design flaw, material degradation due to age, or both. We have a lot of iffy bridges in this country.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8108811 03/27/2407:43 AM03/27/2407:43 AM
I don't see why they couldn't go out in front of the bridge a 100 yds or so and build a piling of sorts on each side of the bridge that's even more secure than what the bridge is sitting on. So if they are not lined up to hit the hole thru the bridge they would hit the piling and get stopped before hitting the bridge. The wife said it wouldn't hold it, but my reply was that the bridge held it, at least until the anchor took hold.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: DaveP]
#8108904 03/27/2410:35 AM03/27/2410:35 AM
Oh it will be union job.....lol A performance bond would help, but does anyone seriously think the union bosses and their pets in Washington won't balk at that....
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: walleyed]
#8108933 03/27/2411:09 AM03/27/2411:09 AM
Can the bridge, tunnel it. In the meantime all hands on deck, cranes on barges, cutting torches, inflatable bags to lift and get the channel open. I do not see why it will take years plural to clear that 450’ shipping channel.
Osky
"A womans heart is the hardest rock the Almighty has put on this earth, and I can find no sign on it"
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109005 03/27/2412:52 PM03/27/2412:52 PM
When disasters hit, normal rules go out the window. Have heard of railroad tracks washing out in floods and the railroad was pushing boxcars full of rocks into the hole while the flood waters till raging. In NW MO during 2011 flood event, railroad had a tug push barges full of rip rap rock from river across farmer's fields.........pulling right into the hole while flood was still raging. As soon as flood waters stopped, they were replacing bed and track. That took days......not weeks or months.
They can come in a cut up the bridge with explosive charges and then drag the pieces off to the side with tugs and cranes. That is the Chesapeake. They have knowledge, equipment and resources the rest of us cannot even imagine. I'll be shocked if that takes more than a week or two to clear.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: slowpoke]
#8109058 03/27/2402:41 PM03/27/2402:41 PM
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
I think that was Chuck Norris
Mean As Nails
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109061 03/27/2402:46 PM03/27/2402:46 PM
The work could be done relatively quick, lots of the major equipment necessary is already in Baltimore harbor. You want it done fast put the Navy seabees in charge. Do they still have Seabees?
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: slowpoke]
#8109088 03/27/2403:43 PM03/27/2403:43 PM
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
That was Boco.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Gary Benson]
#8109100 03/27/2403:57 PM03/27/2403:57 PM
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
That was Boco.
May be right, guy didn't speak a work.of English..
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Jtrapper]
#8109210 03/27/2406:50 PM03/27/2406:50 PM
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
That was Boco.
NRA and NTA Life Member www.BackroadsRevised@etsy.com
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109244 03/27/2407:23 PM03/27/2407:23 PM
I just can't see it not being on purpose. It was going past that piling, and all of a sudden , the black smoke from the stacks, and a hard right, right into the piling. The more I look at the videos , the more it just doesn't look right.
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109295 03/27/2408:19 PM03/27/2408:19 PM
I'm willing to accept it as an accident, stuff happens. BUT the apparent rush to not investigate and the social media silencing of those asking questions, often with nasty commentary, has my conspiracy alarms going off.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: HayDay]
#8109314 03/27/2408:38 PM03/27/2408:38 PM
When disasters hit, normal rules go out the window. Have heard of railroad tracks washing out in floods and the railroad was pushing boxcars full of rocks into the hole while the flood waters till raging. In NW MO during 2011 flood event, railroad had a tug push barges full of rip rap rock from river across farmer's fields.........pulling right into the hole while flood was still raging. As soon as flood waters stopped, they were replacing bed and track. That took days......not weeks or months.
They can come in a cut up the bridge with explosive charges and then drag the pieces off to the side with tugs and cranes. That is the Chesapeake. They have knowledge, equipment and resources the rest of us cannot even imagine. I'll be shocked if that takes more than a week or two to clear.
That’s exactly what the RR did here during the last big flood. It was nuts! More and different types of equipment than Ive ever seen. Miles of trucks loaded with rock on the side of the highway. I thought it would take all summer and they were back up and running in about a week.
I don't think the pilot did anything deliberate. But the black smoke was there. Depending on what they find out about the fuel and if it was polluted then that leaves me leaning toward suspicious activity toward who ever would have done that and just how that happened.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Gary Benson]
#8109320 03/27/2408:42 PM03/27/2408:42 PM
I want to talk to that one survivor, that road that bridge down and swam away .. What a ride that must have been !!!! One lucky dude ! One report said that he refused treatment…..
That was Boco.
You win. Now we need ask Boco for the latest conspiracy theories.
wanna be goat farmer.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109322 03/27/2408:43 PM03/27/2408:43 PM
I have hauled rock on those RR flood jobs. EVERY time weight limits and logs are exempt. Haul as much as you can without any falling off for as many hours as you can stand it.
Funny how that works aint it?
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109326 03/27/2408:46 PM03/27/2408:46 PM
I have hauled rock on those RR flood jobs. EVERY time weight limits and logs are exempt. Haul as much as you can without any falling off for as many hours as you can stand it.
Funny how that works aint it?
Exactly! They were parking equipment on privet property without permission. Parking trucks on shoulder of highway for miles.
They only needed about 6 trucks for rock because by the time the last one could dump the first one would be back. But they hired every truck in the area so nobody else could hire truckers to haul rock elsewhere. It was crazy. That river will be ready for shipping traffic in less than a month if they go about it like the RR does.
Any body with property that has a RR right of way has to give access to the RR. RR is required to fix and or compensate for any damage. Like imminent domain often the recompense gets sorted out by a judge.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109346 03/27/2409:00 PM03/27/2409:00 PM
Any body with property that has a RR right of way has to give access to the RR. RR is required to fix and or compensate for any damage. Like imminent domain often the recompense gets sorted out by a judge.
Yeah, I actually have property that boarders RR right up to the river bridge and that's how it works here. I was giving bridge inspector a ride to and from bridge on 4 wheeler since road was washed out.
These guys were parking and unloading equipment on privet parking lots in town. A guy who owned a mechanic shop in town showed up for work and had nowhere to park his own car let alone customers. Guy from the RR said "figure out what we owe ya, but this is an emergency and we need the room."
What company gonna get the contract to build the bridge. Union or non union union have skilled people in there ranks that do good work. Non union will come in cheaper but in the end it will be more expensive with rework and China pig iron.
I have hauled rock on those RR flood jobs. EVERY time weight limits and logs are exempt. Haul as much as you can without any falling off for as many hours as you can stand it.
Funny how that works aint it?
yes , and ditto on when it is 30 below and LP drivers are in shortage
Ride that bomb , all night long if you want
wife used to dispatch fuel and LP trucks
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109676 03/28/2409:03 AM03/28/2409:03 AM
I'm not an expert but I was reading on another forum that ships burn bunker fuel which is really dirty diesel fuel. The fuel may have been so dirty that the engine stalled. I'm not an authority just something I read.
wanna be goat farmer.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: run]
#8109687 03/28/2409:32 AM03/28/2409:32 AM
I'm not an expert but I was reading on another forum that ships burn bunker fuel which is really dirty diesel fuel. The fuel may have been so dirty that the engine stalled. I'm not an authority just something I read.
I have been reading the same thing. It sounds like like its already polluted, lol. They put everything from industrial waste to tar in it. It may have been so thick it stopped up lines or I would think water would be a killer. The article I read said they burn clean diesel around the ports, then when they get to open sea they pollute away. In the mean time the government has us commoners riding bicycles and wind up toy cars to stop pollution.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109710 03/28/2410:08 AM03/28/2410:08 AM
In my mind, the main problem with all these alternative theories is they fly in the face of the facts of what happened. Boat left harbor with aid of tugs until it got into the shipping channel.......it runs on a single diesel engine, that presumably had started and was running well enough they were willing to put out to sea using it. Then once in the channel, engine had ship making 8 to 9 knots running fair and true down the shipping channel. It maintained that speed and heading......then as it approached the bridge, had momentum and steerage to turn the boat about 15 degrees to starboard, then once on target, aimed right at the pier. The last few hundred yards, it was running straight at it. The chance of all that happening by coincidence owing to chance mechanical failures is preposterous.
What boat also has is 4 onboard diesel generators that provide electrical power. Big ones. Flickering lights and black smoke may have been problems with generator.....but all generators?
And keep in mind, boat normally has a crew of around 20. As far as we know, they all survived and are alive to say what happened. There isn't any reason to speculate as they know what happened. Anybody seen that press conference, cause I haven't. The black box they keep talking about may confirm their story, but their story is their story. They know what happened.
As to the RR, again, this is simply an analogy to make the point that for these types of events, the normal rules go out the window. They do what they got to do to fix it.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8109715 03/28/2410:14 AM03/28/2410:14 AM
I find it interesting that the pillar that the ship hit was the last place to collapse. The bridge was just opened in 1977 so it wasn't an old bridge as far as bridges go.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: gcs]
#8109988 03/28/2405:27 PM03/28/2405:27 PM
Most of these ships are flagged in Singapore and other low cost to operate countries, no matter the actual ownership, or who's leasing them, they all have multinational crews. These ships are huge, heavy and the momentum is tremendous, you can't stop them on a dime. They all have a single engine, which is fine if it's working, the generators are for lights and other ships power but are not enough to restart the main engine. The hard turn was most likely the anchor grabbing plus the forces on the rudder from the tide and momentum. The ship was under the command of the American harbor pilot and his assistant, not some would be terrorist. Sometimes an accident is just that, not a international conspiracy...
Singapore is an independent western nation. It is a parliamentary republic. Its a former colony of Great Britain and the main language is English.
It has a GDP per capita higher than almost any other nation in the world and a AAA credit rating which is better than the USA.
Their government is elected democratically and is the center of most trade in Asia.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with Communist China.
Better look it up.
So they can afford to pay for the new bridge and lost money and production from the closed harbor. Nice to hear
I am even more confused.
Why should Singapore pay for the damage? Singapore doesn't own the ship. It is owned by a private company. The insurance company has already said they think it will cost them 4 billion in damages.
If a plane built in Seattle by Boeing crashed into the French capitol building......should the US pay for that just because the plane was built here ?
Mean As Nails
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Guss]
#8110096 03/28/2407:28 PM03/28/2407:28 PM
White I believe we would pay for it if it was another countrys plain crashing. We pay for everyone and everything.
Like Canada's and the rest of the world that don't pay their part of for NATO, Ukraine, Israel, defense, aud for everyone when they have a disaster and on and on. I know it would be crazy to expect any other country to return any support.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Guss]
#8110167 03/28/2409:11 PM03/28/2409:11 PM
First off this is not directed at any one post or person this is just some observations. I've been sailing 22 years and Hold an unlimited horsepower Chief Engineer License, but I think Ive learned more about shipboard engineering and operations from the internet and YouTube over the last couple days then in that time in training. Watching the video nothing looked like unusual for the ship loosing power to me. The bridge feel faster then I thought it would but I'm not a structural engineer so I can't really comment on that. Feel free to PM me or ask any questions JD
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110258 03/29/2401:34 AM03/29/2401:34 AM
I like the way you think Guss. If we're going to get in a fight, China is the one to fight. After all they did release a virus that killed a bunch of folks, killed an election process, and by fear of the plague killed liberty. Of course they had help from many in the federal bureaucracy of our nation. As for the ship hitting the bridge though, I'm thinking it was likely an accident.
Last edited by J Staton; 03/29/2405:38 AM.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110344 03/29/2408:36 AM03/29/2408:36 AM
Saw a picture of the crane that's going to start the demo of the bridge. They are going to be there a while.
As far as time I heard this morning it could be 5 years, I’m wondering why they don’t use some type of inflation tools to lift the sections of the bridge off to the side, like they do to a ship.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110388 03/29/2409:50 AM03/29/2409:50 AM
It’s not the whole bridge that’s down unless the whole thing is damaged who knows but imagine the weight and then start multiplying and you might not get close.
If it was copper it would be cleaned up by the meth heads in no time.
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
Jerry Herbst
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110474 03/29/2411:55 AM03/29/2411:55 AM
I like the way you think Guss. If we're going to get in a fight, China is the one to fight. After all they did release a virus that killed a bunch of folks, killed an election process, and by fear of the plague killed liberty. Of course they had help from many in the federal bureaucracy of our nation. As for the ship hitting the bridge though, I'm thinking it was likely an accident.
They been doing damage to this country for years.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Gary Benson]
#8110502 03/29/2412:24 PM03/29/2412:24 PM
The old, original I-70 bridge over MO River is being replaced. After they built half the new bridge, they diverted all traffic from old bridge to new bridge, then dropped the old bridge in the river. They cut it up with explosive charges. But entire bridge was dropped to the bottom of the river. They had it cleared for river traffic within a week or so. They can do the same thing to that part of the bridge that is blocking the shipping channel. Cut it up into pieces and drag it out of there. That gets the channel open and port back in business.
There was another large bridge down by Norfolk that had to be replaced. They didn't want highway closed for long, so put in a daily bonus for amount of time bridge was down. Faster they got it built, more they got paid. Guy that got the contract built the bridge off site, then floated it into place on barges. Dropped old bridge and raised new one in a matter of weeks, not months or even a year. I heard his bonus was staggering.
If these guys are on the ball, new bridge is being built even now.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110517 03/29/2412:33 PM03/29/2412:33 PM
Meanwhile, where is official report as to what went wrong? Has gone quiet.......and looks like it is going to stay that way. Just an unexplained accident. Nothing to see here.......move on.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110571 03/29/2402:11 PM03/29/2402:11 PM
I would guess that a proper investigation will take a couple years to complete. So far they really have no information to go on other than the video. They need some data at least about the speed of the ship, its current weight, the angle that it struck the pylon, the electronic logs from the recorders on board that should give some clues as to what happened on board. I suspect there are multiple contributory causes.
I also think that design of the new bridge could take a couple years. They need to investigate the foundations of the existing pylons and see what the river current may or may not have done to them and use that information to decide on what type of bridge to put back in its place.
Needless to say this can happen a lot faster , cheaper and better if government gets out of the way.
Mean As Nails
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: jburson]
#8110574 03/29/2402:18 PM03/29/2402:18 PM
First off this is not directed at any one post or person this is just some observations. I've been sailing 22 years and Hold an unlimited horsepower Chief Engineer License, but I think Ive learned more about shipboard engineering and operations from the internet and YouTube over the last couple days then in that time in training. Watching the video nothing looked like unusual for the ship loosing power to me. The bridge feel faster then I thought it would but I'm not a structural engineer so I can't really comment on that. Feel free to PM me or ask any questions JD
JD, thanks for your professional input.. The way I understand what I have read........ships using US ports must burn low sulfur diesel while in those ports but then change to bunker crude on exiting those ports. IF that is correct........could something like that change of fuels contribute to loss of power ? Would that change take place where the Dali was located as they approached the bridge ?
Thanks
Mean As Nails
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110584 03/29/2402:44 PM03/29/2402:44 PM
Ships close to shore have to burn low sulfur fuel or have exhaust gas scrubbers that scrub out the sulfur. It does not look like that ship had scrubbers running because they form a large steam plume from the water they spray in to the exhaust stream; however if they had lost power the scrubber pumps may not have been restarted and there would not be steam plume. The ship would still be on a low sulfur fuel and would not switch back to heavy fuel until it was well offshore. Engines designed to run on heavy fuels often don't run well on diesel and have less power then when on heavy fuel. I have heard that they fueled in that port so there is a chance that they got a bad batch of fuel and that contributed to blacking out. There are so many things that can cause a ship to black out and loose power it is hard to speculate. Black outs on ships are much more common then most people would think. Until data recorders are looked to see what the problems were (most likely several things were going wrong) any thing is just a wild guess. Hope this helps
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110592 03/29/2402:51 PM03/29/2402:51 PM
I was surprised when the tugs dropped of so far away, might be compliancy or a habit formed from many years of no problems
But can't help thinking that if the tugs had gone with the barge up until going under the bridge they might have been able to help correct the ships problem of the current taking it and its turning into the bridge. Yes they may have need more tugs, however it seems that maybe this will be instigated in the future, or the bridge will be built differently or both ?
Sorry if my opinions or replies offend you, they are not meant to !
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110633 03/29/2403:50 PM03/29/2403:50 PM
I think you're right Grit. From what I have read (there we go again) the pilot did declare a mayday several minutes prior to the strike. That gave the guys on the bridge a little time to stop most traffic and get out of the way. That mayday probably saved a lot of lives too.
Also at 0126 the pilot asked for assistance from a tug and at 0127 he dropped a bow anchor. But they were apparently just too close at that point to overcome the inertia of that loaded ship
Mean As Nails
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110695 03/29/2405:26 PM03/29/2405:26 PM
I have spent many hours on the water, before Covid I was operating vessels on the Hudson and East Rivers. I even posted many pictures from the harbor…
I do have a few theory’s pertaining to the bridge collision.
The Jones Act has lots of information here is just some…
The Merchant Marine act of 1920 was designed to create a safe network of merchant mariners within the U.S. after World War I, in reaction to the U.S. fleet being destroyed by the German navy. The Jones Act requires all goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported by U.S. vessels (and operated primarily by Americans).
It calls for providing the nation with a merchant marine that can transport goods between U.S. ports, increase national security during war times, and support a U.S. maritime industry. This nearly century-old law has been amended several times, most recently in 2006.
While much of the current attention on the Jones Act is focused on foreign shipping regulations, the law also contains important information about the maritime industry’s responsibilities regarding safety and well-being of crew. It safeguards the rights of sailors from being exploited, requiring compensation for injuries due to negligence by their employers. It requires employers to maintain safe environments and provide medical care, and also sets standards for vessel maintenance, safety equipment such as lifeboats, and crew qualifications, training and licensing. And, this all-encompassing law has something to say about the environment too, requiring all U.S. ships to comply with EPA regulations.
The Bottom Line The Jones Act is a 1920 law that limits how cargo is transported by sea. It requires any cargo shipped between U.S. ports to be carried by U.S. ships, with American crews. Originally intended as a measure to support the strategically-important shipping industry, it is now considered a classic example of protectionism.
Lifetime Member NJTA...WTTA Caught the bug in 1979
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8110794 03/29/2407:50 PM03/29/2407:50 PM
I have spent many hours on the water, before Covid I was operating vessels on the Hudson and East Rivers. I even posted many pictures from the harbor…
I do have a few theory’s pertaining to the bridge collision.
The Jones Act has lots of information here is just some…
The Merchant Marine act of 1920 was designed to create a safe network of merchant mariners within the U.S. after World War I, in reaction to the U.S. fleet being destroyed by the German navy. The Jones Act requires all goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported by U.S. vessels (and operated primarily by Americans).
It calls for providing the nation with a merchant marine that can transport goods between U.S. ports, increase national security during war times, and support a U.S. maritime industry. This nearly century-old law has been amended several times, most recently in 2006.
While much of the current attention on the Jones Act is focused on foreign shipping regulations, the law also contains important information about the maritime industry’s responsibilities regarding safety and well-being of crew. It safeguards the rights of sailors from being exploited, requiring compensation for injuries due to negligence by their employers. It requires employers to maintain safe environments and provide medical care, and also sets standards for vessel maintenance, safety equipment such as lifeboats, and crew qualifications, training and licensing. And, this all-encompassing law has something to say about the environment too, requiring all U.S. ships to comply with EPA regulations.
The Bottom Line The Jones Act is a 1920 law that limits how cargo is transported by sea. It requires any cargo shipped between U.S. ports to be carried by U.S. ships, with American crews. Originally intended as a measure to support the strategically-important shipping industry, it is now considered a classic example of protectionism.
I absolutely loved your photos, btw.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: trapdog1]
#8110993 03/30/2405:08 AM03/30/2405:08 AM
I have spent many hours on the water, before Covid I was operating vessels on the Hudson and East Rivers. I even posted many pictures from the harbor…
I do have a few theory’s pertaining to the bridge collision.
The Jones Act has lots of information here is just some…
The Merchant Marine act of 1920 was designed to create a safe network of merchant mariners within the U.S. after World War I, in reaction to the U.S. fleet being destroyed by the German navy. The Jones Act requires all goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported by U.S. vessels (and operated primarily by Americans).
It calls for providing the nation with a merchant marine that can transport goods between U.S. ports, increase national security during war times, and support a U.S. maritime industry. This nearly century-old law has been amended several times, most recently in 2006.
While much of the current attention on the Jones Act is focused on foreign shipping regulations, the law also contains important information about the maritime industry’s responsibilities regarding safety and well-being of crew. It safeguards the rights of sailors from being exploited, requiring compensation for injuries due to negligence by their employers. It requires employers to maintain safe environments and provide medical care, and also sets standards for vessel maintenance, safety equipment such as lifeboats, and crew qualifications, training and licensing. And, this all-encompassing law has something to say about the environment too, requiring all U.S. ships to comply with EPA regulations.
The Bottom Line The Jones Act is a 1920 law that limits how cargo is transported by sea. It requires any cargo shipped between U.S. ports to be carried by U.S. ships, with American crews. Originally intended as a measure to support the strategically-important shipping industry, it is now considered a classic example of protectionism.
I absolutely loved your photos, btw.
I appreciate that Trapdod1, in one of my posts I had photos of a MASSIVE CRANE that was used when the Tapanzee bridge was disabled… I wouldn’t doubt for a moment that the Baltimore port could use that in the clean up…
Lifetime Member NJTA...WTTA Caught the bug in 1979
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: River Birch]
#8111009 03/30/2406:57 AM03/30/2406:57 AM
I appreciate that Trapdod1, in one of my posts I had photos of a MASSIVE CRANE that was used when the Tapanzee bridge was disabled… I wouldn’t doubt for a moment that the Baltimore port could use that in the clean up…
Belive that is the Left Coast Lifter, also did the San Fran bridge. Think it's currently at Staten Island, so figured it'd be used here. And for sale, so good publicity. Guess not.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8111044 03/30/2408:25 AM03/30/2408:25 AM
Clean up and rebuilding the bridge and keeping all the port jobs and keeping the sugar packets coming not to mention the import/export of all the cars and other stuff needs to be on the front burner. Still I'm still stuck on the cause and even time may never reveal the whole story.
While I haven't ran across any specs on the Dali engine, others use 2 cycle 8 cylinders with jugs more than 30'' across. The Dali has 1.5 million gal fuel tank. One of the articles I read said it was assumed they filled up at Baltimore and requires settling out stages and that likely they might have still been using the fuel they loaded somewhere else.
Many incidents in 2023 that caused power outages was caused by chlorinated organic materials or simpler terms pesticides. I remember when a lot of stuff was outlawed here they sold their leftovers others places for them to use up. It seems the official way now to get rid of it it by incineration. Here is an article about that.
They can't keep a bridge 1.5 miles long up. It would be ludicrous to think they could keep one open between continents. That is without the Chinese labor force of course, lol !
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: DaveP]
#8111258 03/30/2401:15 PM03/30/2401:15 PM
I appreciate that Trapdod1, in one of my posts I had photos of a MASSIVE CRANE that was used when the Tapanzee bridge was disabled… I wouldn’t doubt for a moment that the Baltimore port could use that in the clean up…
Belive that is the Left Coast Lifter, also did the San Fran bridge. Think it's currently at Staten Island, so figured it'd be used here. And for sale, so good publicity. Guess not.[/quote]
I don’t recall the barge and cranes name…
However I just watched the news at the top of the hour and the claim the largest crane and barge are on site… If I could figure how to post photos we’d all see this claim is false!
Anyone who knows how to post a photo can pm me either a phone number or email I’ll send you the picture and ask you to post it for me… Thanks
Lifetime Member NJTA...WTTA Caught the bug in 1979
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8111277 03/30/2401:40 PM03/30/2401:40 PM
I think you're right Grit. From what I have read (there we go again) the pilot did declare a mayday several minutes prior to the strike. That gave the guys on the bridge a little time to stop most traffic and get out of the way. That mayday probably saved a lot of lives too.
Also at 0126 the pilot asked for assistance from a tug and at 0127 he dropped a bow anchor. But they were apparently just too close at that point to overcome the inertia of that loaded ship
Also at 0126 the pilot asked for assistance from a tug and at 0127 he dropped a bow anchor. But they were apparently just too close at that point to overcome the inertia of that loaded ship[/quote]
That might be why the ship took such a hard right like it did. The anchor caught and if it was the right anchor, , makes some sense.
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8112229 04/01/2403:09 AM04/01/2403:09 AM
I'm a civil engineer with a good bit of structural experience and I also happen to work for the government.
Cleanup should be quick, but design and construction of this bridge will take many years.
The sheer size of the scope of this project does not lend it to being rebuilt quickly. As stupid as this sounds, when things get political like this, the aesthetics of the new bridge are just as important as the structure.
They could build a simple prefab bridge fairly quick, but that won't cut it
This bridge will have to be impressive
It'll take at least a year to design it, maybe longer. Then construction will take years. Just look at the Harbor Bridge project in Corpus Christi. It is similar in length to the bridge in Baltimore. They started construction in 2016 and should be done by spring of 2025. That's 9 years of construction.
Just remember, in government work the lowest bidder wins
Gotta live up to the nickname...
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: coondagger2]
#8112422 04/01/2411:47 AM04/01/2411:47 AM
I have spent many hours on the water, before Covid I was operating vessels on the Hudson and East Rivers. I even posted many pictures from the harbor…
I do have a few theory’s pertaining to the bridge collision.
The Jones Act has lots of information here is just some…
The Merchant Marine act of 1920 was designed to create a safe network of merchant mariners within the U.S. after World War I, in reaction to the U.S. fleet being destroyed by the German navy. The Jones Act requires all goods shipped between U.S. ports to be transported by U.S. vessels (and operated primarily by Americans).
It calls for providing the nation with a merchant marine that can transport goods between U.S. ports, increase national security during war times, and support a U.S. maritime industry. This nearly century-old law has been amended several times, most recently in 2006.
While much of the current attention on the Jones Act is focused on foreign shipping regulations, the law also contains important information about the maritime industry’s responsibilities regarding safety and well-being of crew. It safeguards the rights of sailors from being exploited, requiring compensation for injuries due to negligence by their employers. It requires employers to maintain safe environments and provide medical care, and also sets standards for vessel maintenance, safety equipment such as lifeboats, and crew qualifications, training and licensing. And, this all-encompassing law has something to say about the environment too, requiring all U.S. ships to comply with EPA regulations.
The Bottom Line The Jones Act is a 1920 law that limits how cargo is transported by sea. It requires any cargo shipped between U.S. ports to be carried by U.S. ships, with American crews. Originally intended as a measure to support the strategically-important shipping industry, it is now considered a classic example of protectionism.
I absolutely loved your photos, btw.
Yep, great photos of your work River Birch!
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113157 04/02/2404:42 PM04/02/2404:42 PM
I have spent many hours driving over bridges, Some are flat out scary. Just a couple years ago they found major structural problems with a bridge over the Mississippi river at Memphis. A barge captain spotted it. D.O.T. blamed it on the contractor hired to inspect it.
Last edited by danny clifton; 04/02/2404:43 PM.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113217 04/02/2405:58 PM04/02/2405:58 PM
Riverbirch, I have a question. I have been a brown water sailor for over 40 years. On the rivers I have navigated I have seen many many protection cells in place to protect bridge piers and any thing else that's best not to be struck by a boat or barge. With that said I have 0% knowledge of Bluewater navigation. The first thing i noticed after seeing this disaster is why in world didn't they have protection cells in place to stop or at least minimize the damage to the bridge? This to me makes no sense whatsoever. Is this normal where you work?
Life member, NRA, NTA, RMEF, Pheasants Forever. WTA,TTA,FTA,SA,GOA, member
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: rpmartin]
#8113426 04/03/2404:25 AM04/03/2404:25 AM
Riverbirch, I have a question. I have been a brown water sailor for over 40 years. On the rivers I have navigated I have seen many many protection cells in place to protect bridge piers and any thing else that's best not to be struck by a boat or barge. With that said I have 0% knowledge of Bluewater navigation. The first thing i noticed after seeing this disaster is why in world didn't they have protection cells in place to stop or at least minimize the damage to the bridge? This to me makes no sense whatsoever. Is this normal where you work?
rpmartin from my experience I’d say less than half the bridges have protection. On the river I have seen and used “defenders “ ( they are big steel piling’s with rubber rollers to help protect other vessels or structures) The weight and inertia of that large cargo ship I’d doubt it would have saved the bridge from the direct hit it took. Possibly they would have helped a glancing mid ship hit. That being said the Verrazano narrows bridge, which I used to cross under often has such a large span, and I have seen many many cargo ships go in and out. They have no reason to go anywhere near the pillars on that bridge once again, if I could figure out how to post pictures, I can post some really cool ones of the Verrazano. …. I appreciate your question and hope that I answered it. If not, let me know. I’ll try again. Thanks.
Lifetime Member NJTA...WTTA Caught the bug in 1979
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113461 04/03/2407:25 AM04/03/2407:25 AM
Thanks RB for your well thought out reply. I'm thinking we both know that given enough time there is no bridge standing that cannot be hit. I did a little research and found out that this bridge was struck by a ship in 1980 but no harm was done. Should have been a wake up call maybe??? Hind sight is always 20/20! If anyone would like to read this click FSK bridge then click Wikipedia, scroll down to history. If someone could copy a link here thank you. And while your at it copy a link of the sunshine bridge history also very interesting and informative. Please don't laugh too hard at my artistic skills but this is basically what I'm talking about. One more thing to remember, the bridge pier stopped the ship right. So these protection cells would be just as big and strong or stronger than the bridge piers. Make sense??
Life member, NRA, NTA, RMEF, Pheasants Forever. WTA,TTA,FTA,SA,GOA, member
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113463 04/03/2407:29 AM04/03/2407:29 AM
Navigating under the Verrazano might be roomy but herding 40 tons over it is not. I would do it at 3-4 in the morning. Lanes are so narrow you have a steer tire literally ontop each of the painted lane dividers. Lots better than the traffic even that time of morning on the GW. Leaving the city in the morning the GW is fine.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113497 04/03/2408:11 AM04/03/2408:11 AM
Bottom line our interstate system needs a LOT of upgrades. More traffic than it was designed for now along with many aging bridges. I can see how the momentum of heavy ships can take out a bridge support. Accidents happen. Guardrails dont prevent every major accident. But they sure enough prevent a huge amount of fatalities. We have money for foreign aid but none for the U.S.? How did that happen?
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113499 04/03/2408:16 AM04/03/2408:16 AM
As big bodies of water go, the Chesapeake is shallow. There are channels to bays and coves that are marked on both sides with navigation aids and even in boats with 5 to 6 foot draft, get out of the channel and you will run aground. Some of these channels may only be 10 feet wide. There are points on some of the river basins that are so shallow you can be 2 miles from shore and run aground in 4 feet of water. From the mouth at Norfolk all the way to Baltimore, there is a narrow, marked shipping channel. Big boats like the Dali get out of it, they will run around. The deepest part of it only 80 feet or so. A lot of 30 to 40 feet water even in the open bay......out of sight of land. That is pretty much the condition that exists on the entire bay.
To even make it to that bridge, the boat had to have control and steerage to stay in the 50 foot deep channel, which it did. Reports are it was favoring the red marker side (red, right, returning), then swerved to starboard to aim at bridge pillar on green marker side. Had it been on green side and swerved to starboard, it would have run aground before it got there.
Have yet to hear the crew's account of what happened. Search for crew reports and you will find there were 22 crew on board, and still are.......the poor dears.....reporting is sympathetic to their plight being stuck on the ship. No reporting on how they screwed up. They all know what happened, at least from their view. They were on the boat.
I'm in the camp that still believes this was no accident.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: warrior]
#8113582 04/03/2410:40 AM04/03/2410:40 AM
When dropping anchor it’s typical to leave 7’ of line per foot of water. With chain it is less due to the weight of chain, the brakes on an anchor chain is quite scary when the anchor is first dropped. Watch a few YouTube videos it’s crazy…
Lifetime Member NJTA...WTTA Caught the bug in 1979
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113605 04/03/2411:32 AM04/03/2411:32 AM
I should also add that the protection cells are filled with stone then 10 or 20 feet of concrete on top of that. They are as big as a house, sometimes bigger or smaller. It depends what they are protecting and weight and speed of what they are trying to stop. Engineers take care of that, way above my pay grade.
Life member, NRA, NTA, RMEF, Pheasants Forever. WTA,TTA,FTA,SA,GOA, member
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113644 04/03/2412:28 PM04/03/2412:28 PM
They just need a bridge ther nothing fancy that cost billions.
Planning, inflation, union wages, graft and corruption. Couple billion here, few billion there, pretty soon, you're talking serious money, lol. I mean, not a fraction of what we're giving away, or worse, spending to actively destroy our own country, but still, a pretty nice chunk.of change.
Re: Francis Scott Bridge collapse
[Re: Foxpaw]
#8113657 04/03/2412:50 PM04/03/2412:50 PM
The design engineers piece of the pie is a percentage of the total cost of the structure, so they like to make it as expensive as they can get away with. I've seen some mighty nice buildings in a danged sewer plant.