No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: bblwi] #8063748
01/29/24 07:49 PM
01/29/24 07:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,568
Wi.
D
Diggerman Offline
trapper
Diggerman  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,568
Wi.
Originally Posted by bblwi

Defimation, slander etc. are very different than rape. It is easier to convict parties on defimation than rape and Trump continued to defame the lady and the lawyer for the the prosecution was far, far better than Trump's lawyer. One would think he could afford better legal lawyers but maybe those willing to defend him tire of the process and how rarely listens to their advice anyway.

Bryce

Is defamation a 2 way street? Can Trump sue her for 84 million for defaming him?

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: danvee] #8063764
01/29/24 08:02 PM
01/29/24 08:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
M
mnsota Offline
trapper
mnsota  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
Originally Posted by danvee
He could have saved himself a bunch of money by keeping his yap shut and letting his attorney talk.



Would you keep your yap shut if you were falsely accused of rape?

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: wr otis] #8063768
01/29/24 08:07 PM
01/29/24 08:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline
"Minka"
James  Offline
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
Originally Posted by wr otis
Most of, or all of the cases against trump will be reversed on appeal. But that will happen after the election, which is the whole point of these cases.

Trump has had problems retaining top legal counsel, because there is a group of lawyers that threaten and harass anyone willing to represent him. They file bar complaints against or threaten bar complaints until people cave in.

Let that sink in.

OJ was acquitted because the la pd falsified evidence, they planted evidence. Maybe they didn't need to, but they did and got caught.


Do you have any sources or proof for those claims?

If you can predict the outcome on appeal for Trump's numerous legal cases, you must have a crystal ball. You're making predictions that few lawyers would attempt.

Your claim that other lawyers are being mean to Trump's lawyers, filing Bar grievances and making threats, is ridiculous on its face for several reasons. First, litigation attorneys don't care who's mean to them. Someone is always being mean in that field. Litigation attorneys need a thick skin, or else should take up writing trust documents or something.

Second, the filing of a Bar grievance is strictly confidential pending investigation and outcome. Any lawyer who reveals the existence of a Bar grievance is themself guilty of an ethics violation. The odds that anyone with personal knowledge would take that risk and reveal the grievance are slim. The odds that you're simply repeating rumor and innuendo are much higher.

Third, filing groundless grievances also risks an ethics violation.

You ought to quit representing rumor as fact. It hurts your credibility with those who know better. I now know to take your claims with a healthy dose of salt--unless you support them with a source.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: wr otis] #8063771
01/29/24 08:09 PM
01/29/24 08:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,857
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,857
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by wr otis
Dershowitz discussed it on his podcast, because they did it to him also. At the minimum they tie up your time and cost you a bunch of money. I believe he said the legal bill for someone to represent him in his case was 10k.

Dershowitz's podcast is on mon tue and wed every week. Well worth watching, interesting and insightful.

LA cops moved blood evidence, and got caught.



Yeah, okay.


-Goofy-
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: Diggerman] #8063782
01/29/24 08:14 PM
01/29/24 08:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline
"Minka"
James  Offline
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
Originally Posted by Diggerman
Originally Posted by bblwi

Defimation, slander etc. are very different than rape. It is easier to convict parties on defimation than rape and Trump continued to defame the lady and the lawyer for the the prosecution was far, far better than Trump's lawyer. One would think he could afford better legal lawyers but maybe those willing to defend him tire of the process and how rarely listens to their advice anyway.

Bryce

Is defamation a 2 way street? Can Trump sue her for 84 million for defaming him?


If you mean sue her for her claim that he sexually assaulted her, truth is a defense to defamation. So far as Trump is concerned, Carroll's claim is true. A prior jury found that he sexually assaulted her, which binds Trump to that fact. If Trump sued, his case would be dismissed.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063794
01/29/24 08:26 PM
01/29/24 08:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
Trump should sue himself for defamation-he would win.


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063801
01/29/24 08:31 PM
01/29/24 08:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
D
danvee Offline
trapper
danvee  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
Trump said he is a man of the law and we are a nation of laws whats the issue??

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063811
01/29/24 08:41 PM
01/29/24 08:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
M
mnsota Offline
trapper
mnsota  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
The issue is truth and common sense tells me it is not being adhered to!

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: danvee] #8063869
01/29/24 09:30 PM
01/29/24 09:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 1,514
WI
M
Mando Offline
trapper
Mando  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 1,514
WI
Originally Posted by danvee
Trump said he is a man of the law and we are a nation of laws whats the issue??

Originally Posted by danvee
Trump said he is a man of the law and we are a nation of laws whats the issue??

And Biden said he chooses truth over facts. Crazy right?

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: Boco] #8063889
01/29/24 09:42 PM
01/29/24 09:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,367
Maine, Aroostook
Posco Offline
trapper
Posco  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,367
Maine, Aroostook
Originally Posted by Boco
Trump cant get anyone to help him because of his penchant for throwing loyal people under the bus.

You have that just backward. Trump is loyal to those that are loyal to him.

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: Posco] #8063910
01/29/24 09:53 PM
01/29/24 09:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,476
Northern Ohio ...
S
Sullivan K Offline
"Keith"
Sullivan K  Offline
"Keith"
S

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,476
Northern Ohio ...
Originally Posted by Posco
Originally Posted by Boco
Trump cant get anyone to help him because of his penchant for throwing loyal people under the bus.

You have that just backward. Trump is loyal to those that are loyal to him.


Wow!


My name ain't Keith
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063941
01/29/24 10:13 PM
01/29/24 10:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,464
Missouri
ol' dad Offline OP
trapper
ol' dad  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,464
Missouri
James, can you address the original question that I started the thread with?

Your second post seems to contradict the fact that he was found innocent in the criminal case. How can both be true?

Ol dad

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063979
01/29/24 10:56 PM
01/29/24 10:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
D
danvee Offline
trapper
danvee  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
Unless you sat in like the jury did and listened to all the testimony, evidence and what the judge read as procedure how can you contradict or second guess. To do so is biased and the first things a judge will discuss after reading charges and asking for a plea, is for the jury not to decide or predetermine judgement until the trial is over.

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063983
01/29/24 11:04 PM
01/29/24 11:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,000
South Dakota
R
Rat Masterson Offline
trapper
Rat Masterson  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,000
South Dakota
I f anyone thinks Trump is getting a fair shake in any of his trials, well you really can't fix stupid.

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8063995
01/29/24 11:16 PM
01/29/24 11:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
Trump is his own worst enemy.
I didnt think he was gonna throw his best buddy Rudy under the bus but in the wink of an eye-by by Rudy,lol.
Just used and tossed like a dirty kleenex.

Last edited by Boco; 01/29/24 11:17 PM.

Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: danvee] #8064003
01/29/24 11:21 PM
01/29/24 11:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
M
mnsota Offline
trapper
mnsota  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,938
minnesota
Originally Posted by danvee
Unless you sat in like the jury did and listened to all the testimony, evidence and what the judge read as procedure how can you contradict or second guess. To do so is biased and the first things a judge will discuss after reading charges and asking for a plea, is for the jury not to decide or predetermine judgement until the trial is over.


Maybe because most of this was voided out?

A few details the judge deemed "inadmissible" during the trial

She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened
She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”)
Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows
She has a history of falsely accusing men of ra**, including Les Moonves
She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of ra** as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vag***



Again, common sense tells me this was nothing more than a planned political hit job!,.of course this will take time in appeal.
You and MSM will have ample time to gloat.

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8064007
01/29/24 11:24 PM
01/29/24 11:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,648
james bay frontierOnt.
To answer the original poster,

No because you cant tell a heinze pickle nothing.


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8064008
01/29/24 11:24 PM
01/29/24 11:24 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
D
danvee Offline
trapper
danvee  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,043
wyoming southeast
Did you sit in on the trail or get all these tidbit off the bathroom wall youtube broadcaster please show me that evidence out of a court log.

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: ol' dad] #8064009
01/29/24 11:26 PM
01/29/24 11:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,403
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,403
East-Central Wisconsin
Sure Trump can sue her for that, if he can put together the proof that she did. The only real way he could do that is that they took him to court for this case and would have lost. If he plans to sue her he best get a lawyer that knows how to work in a court room and is not just a young face setting next to him.

Bryce

Re: Can someone explain this? (Trump post) [Re: James] #8064014
01/29/24 11:27 PM
01/29/24 11:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,353
North Cass Co. Minnesota
DiggerDale Offline
trapper
DiggerDale  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,353
North Cass Co. Minnesota
Originally Posted by James


If you mean sue her for her claim that he sexually assaulted her, truth is a defense to defamation. So far as Trump is concerned, Carroll's claim is true. A prior jury found that he sexually assaulted her, which binds Trump to that fact. If Trump sued, his case would be dismissed.

Jim

Do you have any sources or proof for that claim?

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread