From OANN -

Not meant to be a political post, but genuinely curious how one is found innocent of rape but guilty of defamation by the person who is accusing him of rape? I don't know of any other cases to cite.

Just curious, on the chance that someone accuses me of stealing a muskrat from their set, I'd hate to call them a name and it end up costing me my life savings.

ol' dad

All of it sounds strange. If he did it why is he not in jail? Sounds like it's all about money...

Yep

My question why isn't she guilty of defamation for a false rape charge?
I'm sure this will get knocked down or eliminated on appeal.

Look into her connections with others and see who they are. That'll convince you that this is a hit job to ruin Trump.

Gotta ask yourself why are there so many people who are trying everything they can do to get Trump off the ballot, and out of politics.

And yet after all this most polls have Trump beating biden. Alot of people are wise to whats going on and can see the blatant double standard.

Apparently there was no case in the (90)s or is the coverup gonna be the next big case

Statue of limitations had already run out, so NY gave a year to file, then closed it again, obviously tailoring the tempororary law change to her case.
If that isn't targeted lawfare, what is?
I'm sure our resident lawyers will tell us!

She couldn't say what month, or even what year exactly, the alleged incident took.place.
Claims she saved the dress she was wearing at the time, but that dress wasnt manufactured until years later.

"In 2019, Carroll came forward with a rape claim against Trump in her then forthcoming book, What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal, an excerpt of which ran that June in New York magazine. Trump responded to Carroll’s claim – that he sexually assaulted her in a high-end department store dressing room around early 1996 – by saying she was a dishonest political operative.

Carroll sued him for defamation, as the statute of limitations barred her from suing over the assault. When a New York law in 2022 granted accusers a one-year window to sue their abusers for incidents outside the civil statute of limitations, Carroll commenced another civil action – this time for the assault and his defamatory statements about her post-presidency."

Is this unique and a one of / one time deal cooked up just to get Trump? You get to take em to civil kangaroo court and never have to prove anything?

If not, and you can do this anywheere, I'd think James Carvelle would be on the hook to Paula Jones. Something about dragging $100 bill thru a trailer court? And for that matter, Slick Willie to all the women like Jones that he abused whilst guvnor and POTUS.

But more than likely, this is just one more attempt to bludgeon Trump in kangaroo court of public opinion (the dolts eat it up with a spoon) and an attempt to bankrupt him from legal fees alone.

Prosecutorial misconduct has to be lurking in the weeds.

He was guilty of saying he didn't do it . Said she was lying. THAT IS normal behavior. SO shouldn't monica Lewinsky sue bill Clinton. He said he didn't do her but he did......

If you can’t jail him then plan B is to bankrupt him they will try to destroy him one way or another hook or crook.

James could likely explain it better but there is a different bar applied to a criminal case and a civil one.
One is beyond reasonable doubt the other is preponderance of evidence.
Just because one cannot prove something beyond reasonable doubt does not mean it did not happen.
Still guilty in the civil court by an overwhelming preponderance of evidence.The bar is not as high in the civil court.

Same thing ocurred with OJ.

Our legal system is moving from a means to justice to a weapon to destroy an enemy especially in liberal states and at higher Federal levels. A lot of people thinks it's OK because it represents their views when in actuality the court system should represent justice and the laws. When courts don't do this laws become meaningless. Especially for those in power.

So what if the person is truly innocent? Do they not have a right to deny the allegations without fear of punishment by a civil court? How is one supposed to clear their name?

ol dad

Dont ask me those are your laws.

Not sure you can be pardoned when you lose a civil suit.

Probably an appeal.

It's all about bankrupt Trump so he has no money to campaign.

[video:youtube]https://youtu.be/LrewUpKXtOg?si=7enezicb5o8IA4wj[/video]

She'll never get the money he will win his appeal.

One word "POLITICS" Trump's Lawyer was not allowed to bring up a finding that every juror was a registered Democrat. Imagine that in NYC. And why did she wait 2-1/2 decades to bring up this? They did the same exact thing to Kavanaugh. This seems to be the new political attack point of the Democrat Party.

The liars case is being financially supported by Reid Hoffman, yes,. the same democrat billionaire supporting the globalist Haley to bring down Trump.