Wilderness Trapping and Living


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~Dobbins' Catalog~

ATS
(Please support Ted's Fur Shed, our sponsor for the Wilderness Page)


Alaska Trappers Association

Print Thread
Hop To
Ski doo engine pick #8024654
12/19/23 12:02 AM
12/19/23 12:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 983
Bemidji, MN
J
Jacks Offline OP
trapper
Jacks  Offline OP
trapper
J

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 983
Bemidji, MN
Help me pick between 850 e tech or 900 turbo r for a ski doo expedition se.

What are your thoughts? Do you notice the extra weight with the 900 ?

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8024703
12/19/23 01:44 AM
12/19/23 01:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,122
AK
F
FL cracker in AK Offline
trapper
FL cracker in AK  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,122
AK
With subpar gas in the villages, and expensive to boot, most people out here go with ACE engines. The 900 is as tough as nails too.


Psalm 34:6
Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8025019
12/19/23 01:09 PM
12/19/23 01:09 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
broncoformudv Offline
trapper
broncoformudv  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
What will you be using it for?

The 900 ACE and 850 ETEC are real close in weight. But the 900 ACE turbo weighs a good bit more than a non turbo 850 etec. Turbo to turbo is comparable in weight.

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8025061
12/19/23 02:16 PM
12/19/23 02:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,568
western alaska
Malukchuk Offline
trapper
Malukchuk  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,568
western alaska
I have the the 900 turbo in the expedition. My brother has the two stroke. You can feel the difference in weight when trying to maneuver the two through snow. The two stroke being a little lighter is easier to throw around. Gas consumption is the same.


Water is good for two things, Floating Ships and making Beer.
Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: FL cracker in AK] #8025084
12/19/23 03:00 PM
12/19/23 03:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,182
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,182
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by FL cracker in AK
With subpar gas in the villages, and expensive to boot, most people out here go with ACE engines. The 900 is as tough as nails too.



Interesting comment. Can you expand on your thinking concerning "subpar" gas ?


Mean As Nails
Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8025554
12/19/23 11:36 PM
12/19/23 11:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,122
AK
F
FL cracker in AK Offline
trapper
FL cracker in AK  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,122
AK
We can only get 87 octane, the etecs I've had call for 91 octane. Add to that lots of water in the gas. Most people don't use filter funnels like I do.


Psalm 34:6
Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8026024
12/20/23 03:06 PM
12/20/23 03:06 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
broncoformudv Offline
trapper
broncoformudv  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
The etecs do call for 91 but they will self adjust the timing when lower octane fuel is used. I know the new turbo 4 strokes also call for 91 but I don't know if they self adjust the timing to run lower octane fuel?

The 4 stroke engines weigh the same as their 2 stroke counter parts 600 vs 600 and 900 vs 800/850. Turbos on either 2 stroke or 4 stroke add 15-20 lbs.

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8026043
12/20/23 03:22 PM
12/20/23 03:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Idaho
B
bearcat2 Offline
trapper
bearcat2  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Idaho
I have a nonturbo 900 ACE and love the quietness, never felt the need for more power than it already has, but then I've never drove a turboed one to know what I am missing. The turbos are a lot louder, I've heard. Frankly if you are going with a wide track or a super wide track, I don't know that 15-20 lbs is going to matter, the machines are a tank that already weigh so much. I am amazed by the 250 lb guys with a beer belly that are spending hundreds or thousands of dollars for aftermarket parts for their hotrod snowmachine to shave a few pounds, and would never have an electric start because that battery is too heavy. If they are that worried about weight on their snowmachine, maybe they should lay off the Krispy Cremes.

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8026087
12/20/23 04:34 PM
12/20/23 04:34 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
broncoformudv Offline
trapper
broncoformudv  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
bearcat you bring up some great points about weight!

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: FL cracker in AK] #8026097
12/20/23 04:51 PM
12/20/23 04:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,182
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,182
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by FL cracker in AK
We can only get 87 octane, the etecs I've had call for 91 octane. Add to that lots of water in the gas. Most people don't use filter funnels like I do.



Thanks for the response.
I have never heard anyone around here complain about the quality of the gas. But you are right that folks can be careless about water and ice crystals. Every drop of fuel that goes in my snowmachines and my outboard goes through a water-block filter first and then through a chamois before it goes into the machine. Condensation can still be an issue but a little alcohol takes care of that.

A lot of guys here mix 87 UNL and 100 LL avgas for both snogo's and some airplanes. Adds a bit of expense on the snogo fuel but apparently they think it helps performance on some machines.


Mean As Nails
Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8026327
12/20/23 09:16 PM
12/20/23 09:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,598
Timmins Ontario
G
gibb Offline
trapper
gibb  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,598
Timmins Ontario
I think when you factor in the cost of the oil for the E-tech the 900 ACE makes more sense?

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: gibb] #8028009
12/22/23 12:51 PM
12/22/23 12:51 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
broncoformudv Offline
trapper
broncoformudv  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 772
Anchorage, Alaska
Originally Posted by gibb
I think when you factor in the cost of the oil for the E-tech the 900 ACE makes more sense?



Not to mention the noise and smell. I run ACE engine in my utility sleds and 2 stroke in the play sleds. Last winter I was on a winter hunt with 3 friends, 3 of us had 4 stroke sleds and 1 was running an etec. Needless to say I made sure I wasn't riding behind him and you sure heard his sled over all of ours. When I converted to 4 stroke I started hearing all sorts of noises on my sleds I had never heard before, crazy how quiet they are.

Re: Ski doo engine pick [Re: Jacks] #8032848
12/27/23 11:15 PM
12/27/23 11:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 224
Minnesota
B
BeLiSlE330 Offline
trapper
BeLiSlE330  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 224
Minnesota
900 ACE for sure!


"No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -Thomas Jefferson
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  akntrpr, Ol' Blister, otterman 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1