No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855637
04/29/23 06:35 AM
04/29/23 06:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,658
lincoln co mo
jonesy Offline
trapper
jonesy  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,658
lincoln co mo
buffalo gnats killing em

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855793
04/29/23 12:13 PM
04/29/23 12:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
C
claycreech Offline
trapper
claycreech  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
We don’t have buffalo gnats here yet Tracey.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855821
04/29/23 01:29 PM
04/29/23 01:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
C
claycreech Offline
trapper
claycreech  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
To give folks an idea of the decline in turkey numbers here and in much of Northern Missouri.
We have always had mandatory checking (reporting) of harvested turkeys. The county that I live in peaked in the late 90’s at 804 turkeys in a spring season. We were between 660 to 770 for years. Today we struggle to check in 300 birds, with more hunters than ever, and more experienced turkey hunters than ever.
Just to give a little perspective………..

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855837
04/29/23 02:08 PM
04/29/23 02:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 339
Ohio
D
Dan D Offline
trapper
Dan D  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 339
Ohio
That's really tough. I used to travel to Knox County in the early 2000s to hunt with an old friend from Ohio. Couldn't believe the number of turkeys compared to where I live. Easy to tag out every year even for a novice like me. Hope it turns around.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: claycreech] #7855840
04/29/23 02:09 PM
04/29/23 02:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554
illinois
J
jalstat Online content
trapper
jalstat  Online Content
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554
illinois
Originally Posted by claycreech
To give folks an idea of the decline in turkey numbers here and in much of Northern Missouri.
We have always had mandatory checking (reporting) of harvested turkeys. The county that I live in peaked in the late 90’s at 804 turkeys in a spring season. We were between 660 to 770 for years. Today we struggle to check in 300 birds, with more hunters than ever, and more experienced turkey hunters than ever.
Just to give a little perspective………..

Nice input Clay

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855847
04/29/23 02:23 PM
04/29/23 02:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,119
NW MO
T
TurkeyTime Offline
trapper
TurkeyTime  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,119
NW MO
Clay I don't know my counties numbers history but I would say it is similar and that 300 number would be even less if the hunter numbers were the same as late 90's early 00's. We can also add in more guns that shoot 50+ yards and stalking with fans. Electronic calls are of course illegal but I have wondered if any ever use their cell phone. Pretty hard to prove an electronic call with a phone.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855855
04/29/23 02:30 PM
04/29/23 02:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,119
NW MO
T
TurkeyTime Offline
trapper
TurkeyTime  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,119
NW MO
Clay I read page 3 first posted then back to 2. To your post on page 2 I completely agree with all the observations you mentioned. I have been saying it for years now but something is going on. I too do not believe the habitat and predator theory, at least around here. Predator numbers were high when the boom started and peaked. I can take anyone to several spots that the habitat has not changed one bit in 5 years and turkey numbers went from having some to none. An unknown is having a huge impact on turkeys.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855873
04/29/23 03:03 PM
04/29/23 03:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,932
iowa
bankrunner Offline
trapper
bankrunner  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,932
iowa
Plenty of spots here in NE Iowa had turkeys everywhere, not anymore. Barely hear gobbles anymore, every field had strutters in the spring , not anymore. More random hens without little ones wandering around. In the last few years, I maybe see a group or two of poults( I gravel travel a lot) and haven't seen a jake while hunting in 5 years.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855884
04/29/23 03:25 PM
04/29/23 03:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,254
San Antonio , Texas
Y
Yotegiter Offline
trapper
Yotegiter  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,254
San Antonio , Texas
When we first started hunting a small place in SW Oklahoma back in 2011, there was tons of birds. And according to the neighbor
That’s lived there all his life, those numbers were way down.

We have not even tried to hunt out there in the last several years, because there is not a huntable population to speak of. It used to be one of our favorite pastimes.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7855928
04/29/23 04:33 PM
04/29/23 04:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
C
claycreech Offline
trapper
claycreech  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: TurkeyTime] #7856156
04/29/23 10:33 PM
04/29/23 10:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,149
mo.
N
nate Offline
trapper
nate  Offline
trapper
N

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,149
mo.
Originally Posted by TurkeyTime
Clay I read page 3 first posted then back to 2. To your post on page 2 I completely agree with all the observations you mentioned. I have been saying it for years now but something is going on. I too do not believe the habitat and predator theory, at least around here. Predator numbers were high when the boom started and peaked. I can take anyone to several spots that the habitat has not changed one bit in 5 years and turkey numbers went from having some to none. An unknown is having a huge impact on turkeys.

It's the farming practices/chemicals Monsanto/Bayer and the government the farmer's are puppets that sold out to big money, it's not predation it's not habitat loss its chemicals, first went the quail then then rats then the pheasant now you have song birds woodpeckers turkey rabbits butterfly bee's , all this predator/habitat is BS the only reason they can't figure it out and or fix it is because all the money behind it. Studies are about like our last few elections the outcome will be whatever the big guys want.

Last edited by nate; 04/29/23 10:36 PM.
Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7856167
04/29/23 10:46 PM
04/29/23 10:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,445
western mn
B
bucksnbears Offline
trapper
bucksnbears  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,445
western mn
Sure may something about insects?
When I built my cabin 15 years ago, there were bugs/frogs by the gazillion.
Even though I'm only 100 yards from a river, mosquitoes are almost extinct now. Same as frogs.

Something has changed for sure.


swampgas chili and schmidt beer makes for a deadly combo

You have to remember that 1 out of 3 Democratic Voters is just as dumb as the other two.
Re: MO a bust so far [Re: claycreech] #7856173
04/29/23 10:56 PM
04/29/23 10:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510
Arkansas
W
WhiteCliffs Offline
trapper
WhiteCliffs  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510
Arkansas
Originally Posted by claycreech
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.

Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous?

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7856197
04/29/23 11:23 PM
04/29/23 11:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 118
Kansas
K
Kansasace2 Offline
trapper
Kansasace2  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 118
Kansas
This thread is interesting in that here in central Kansas it’s the same story, there were three to four hundred birds all around my place. Strutters everywhere and not uncommon to see forty fifty birds on almost every wheat field. I don’t think the neonictoids are it they have not been used for years well at least 2018. However there is a new class of insecticide that is a virus a live contagion that kills the bugs and thus it may be killing the birds. This stuff came into the market about three years ago and that coincides with the decline of birds here in Central Kansas.

This insecticide has to be refrigerated and kept viable rather than just hot mix and dump in a tank. I will have to look up what the stuff is again but I have been banging my head trying to figure out what is up. I thought drought and disease but the talk of insecticide jarred my memory of this virus crap insecticide..

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: WhiteCliffs] #7856204
04/29/23 11:30 PM
04/29/23 11:30 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
C
claycreech Offline
trapper
claycreech  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
Originally Posted by WhiteCliffs
Originally Posted by claycreech
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.

Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous?


Good question.
I do not know.
I do know that declining turkey populations do not seem to be as bad in states with relatively new populations.
Neonics are used many ways, but predominantly as a seed treatment that is systemic within the plant. It’s in the plant and the pollen.
Neonics have been banned in Europe for well over 10 years in an attempt to save bees.
It’s just a theory, but is one shared by many. Correct or not, something’s going on in the outdoors and it ain’t good.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7856206
04/29/23 11:35 PM
04/29/23 11:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510
Arkansas
W
WhiteCliffs Offline
trapper
WhiteCliffs  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510
Arkansas
Recent Tennessee turkey study just completed:

“ In brief, findings indicate low nest success and poult survival as a result of predation is limiting the population,”

https://turkeysfortomorrow.org/funding-critical-research-in-tennessee/

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: nate] #7856399
04/30/23 10:01 AM
04/30/23 10:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,068
SE Kansas
K
K52 Offline
trapper
K52  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,068
SE Kansas
Originally Posted by nate
Originally Posted by TurkeyTime
Clay I read page 3 first posted then back to 2. To your post on page 2 I completely agree with all the observations you mentioned. I have been saying it for years now but something is going on. I too do not believe the habitat and predator theory, at least around here. Predator numbers were high when the boom started and peaked. I can take anyone to several spots that the habitat has not changed one bit in 5 years and turkey numbers went from having some to none. An unknown is having a huge impact on turkeys.

It's the farming practices/chemicals Monsanto/Bayer and the government the farmer's are puppets that sold out to big money, it's not predation it's not habitat loss its chemicals, first went the quail then then rats then the pheasant now you have song birds woodpeckers turkey rabbits butterfly bee's , all this predator/habitat is BS the only reason they can't figure it out and or fix it is because all the money behind it. Studies are about like our last few elections the outcome will be whatever the big guys want.


I think Nate hit it on the head. The farmers here spray because the sun came up, it's cloudy or anything else. They spray everything. Want you to have beehives next to fields and then spray and kill them. The Co-op here built a big facility with huge tanks and spray rigs,they load up semi's with big tanks and you see them and spray rigs everywhere.

The decline in wildlife is like the decline in row crop cultivators, they used to be used everywhere but the sprays and chemicals killed both off.

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: Law Dog] #7856409
04/30/23 10:12 AM
04/30/23 10:12 AM
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554
illinois
J
jalstat Online content
trapper
jalstat  Online Content
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554
illinois
Also I believe spraying herbicide is responsible for cotton tail decline

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: WhiteCliffs] #7856421
04/30/23 10:37 AM
04/30/23 10:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
C
claycreech Offline
trapper
claycreech  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
Originally Posted by WhiteCliffs
Recent Tennessee turkey study just completed:

“ In brief, findings indicate low nest success and poult survival as a result of predation is limiting the population,”

https://turkeysfortomorrow.org/funding-critical-research-in-tennessee/



Quail research has pretty much turned me against the results of research funded by outside sources.
Billions have been spent on quail research.
You see the results.

Can someone shoot me an example of a wildlife population decline that was turned around due to research discovering the cause?

Re: MO a bust so far [Re: WhiteCliffs] #7856574
04/30/23 02:21 PM
04/30/23 02:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,971
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,971
South metro, MN
Originally Posted by WhiteCliffs
Originally Posted by claycreech
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.

Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous?


Yes, we use neonicotinoids up here. Lots of people trying to outlaw them and typically use the honey bee for emotional support/backing. I don't see it having merit as I run about 70 hives next to farmlands that neonics are used. I know of a guy who runs 1500 hives in Manitoba on his Canola farm. He has a success rate that most of us would die for and uses plenty of Neonics right next to his hives...and it's not hard to kill bees.

Now I can see someone making an argument along the lines of "application differences" from state to state? ( If there's any difference). I'm not aware of any differences in application mandates....but I wouldn't be a person who would know, in reality.

Here in MN. (According to the DNR) we have not seen much of a decline in turkey numbers, other than sporadic talk...actually a steady growth of both turkey and hunters, according to the DNR.

Most of the turkeys in this state are located in the Southeast region where farmlands is present amongst mature trees/hills, etc. Last year we harvested a little over 12,000 turkeys in the spring season alone with more hunters than ever before. The DNR claims hunting has no effect on the numbers.

MN (at least where most of the turkey are) also have plenty of predators: Coon, skunk and of course coyotes galore.

When MN introduced Turkeys decades ago, I remember having some real hard winters. They didn't die off but continued to grow and expand their ranges

I don't pretend have any answers...and why I posed the initial question. Thanks for the comments. I find them interesting (in a good way).

Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread