Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: claycreech]
#7855840
04/29/23 02:09 PM
04/29/23 02:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554 illinois
jalstat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 4,554
illinois
|
To give folks an idea of the decline in turkey numbers here and in much of Northern Missouri. We have always had mandatory checking (reporting) of harvested turkeys. The county that I live in peaked in the late 90’s at 804 turkeys in a spring season. We were between 660 to 770 for years. Today we struggle to check in 300 birds, with more hunters than ever, and more experienced turkey hunters than ever. Just to give a little perspective……….. Nice input Clay
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: TurkeyTime]
#7856156
04/29/23 10:33 PM
04/29/23 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,149 mo.
nate
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,149
mo.
|
Clay I read page 3 first posted then back to 2. To your post on page 2 I completely agree with all the observations you mentioned. I have been saying it for years now but something is going on. I too do not believe the habitat and predator theory, at least around here. Predator numbers were high when the boom started and peaked. I can take anyone to several spots that the habitat has not changed one bit in 5 years and turkey numbers went from having some to none. An unknown is having a huge impact on turkeys. It's the farming practices/chemicals Monsanto/Bayer and the government the farmer's are puppets that sold out to big money, it's not predation it's not habitat loss its chemicals, first went the quail then then rats then the pheasant now you have song birds woodpeckers turkey rabbits butterfly bee's , all this predator/habitat is BS the only reason they can't figure it out and or fix it is because all the money behind it. Studies are about like our last few elections the outcome will be whatever the big guys want.
Last edited by nate; 04/29/23 10:36 PM.
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: Law Dog]
#7856167
04/29/23 10:46 PM
04/29/23 10:46 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,445 western mn
bucksnbears
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,445
western mn
|
Sure may something about insects? When I built my cabin 15 years ago, there were bugs/frogs by the gazillion. Even though I'm only 100 yards from a river, mosquitoes are almost extinct now. Same as frogs.
Something has changed for sure.
swampgas chili and schmidt beer makes for a deadly combo
You have to remember that 1 out of 3 Democratic Voters is just as dumb as the other two.
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: claycreech]
#7856173
04/29/23 10:56 PM
04/29/23 10:56 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510 Arkansas
WhiteCliffs
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 510
Arkansas
|
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.
Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous?
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: WhiteCliffs]
#7856204
04/29/23 11:30 PM
04/29/23 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754 Sumner, Mo.
claycreech
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
|
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.
Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous? Good question. I do not know. I do know that declining turkey populations do not seem to be as bad in states with relatively new populations. Neonics are used many ways, but predominantly as a seed treatment that is systemic within the plant. It’s in the plant and the pollen. Neonics have been banned in Europe for well over 10 years in an attempt to save bees. It’s just a theory, but is one shared by many. Correct or not, something’s going on in the outdoors and it ain’t good.
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: nate]
#7856399
04/30/23 10:01 AM
04/30/23 10:01 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,068 SE Kansas
K52
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,068
SE Kansas
|
Clay I read page 3 first posted then back to 2. To your post on page 2 I completely agree with all the observations you mentioned. I have been saying it for years now but something is going on. I too do not believe the habitat and predator theory, at least around here. Predator numbers were high when the boom started and peaked. I can take anyone to several spots that the habitat has not changed one bit in 5 years and turkey numbers went from having some to none. An unknown is having a huge impact on turkeys. It's the farming practices/chemicals Monsanto/Bayer and the government the farmer's are puppets that sold out to big money, it's not predation it's not habitat loss its chemicals, first went the quail then then rats then the pheasant now you have song birds woodpeckers turkey rabbits butterfly bee's , all this predator/habitat is BS the only reason they can't figure it out and or fix it is because all the money behind it. Studies are about like our last few elections the outcome will be whatever the big guys want. I think Nate hit it on the head. The farmers here spray because the sun came up, it's cloudy or anything else. They spray everything. Want you to have beehives next to fields and then spray and kill them. The Co-op here built a big facility with huge tanks and spray rigs,they load up semi's with big tanks and you see them and spray rigs everywhere. The decline in wildlife is like the decline in row crop cultivators, they used to be used everywhere but the sprays and chemicals killed both off.
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: WhiteCliffs]
#7856421
04/30/23 10:37 AM
04/30/23 10:37 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754 Sumner, Mo.
claycreech
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,754
Sumner, Mo.
|
Quail research has pretty much turned me against the results of research funded by outside sources. Billions have been spent on quail research. You see the results. Can someone shoot me an example of a wildlife population decline that was turned around due to research discovering the cause?
|
|
|
Re: MO a bust so far
[Re: WhiteCliffs]
#7856574
04/30/23 02:21 PM
04/30/23 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,971 South metro, MN
Calvin
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,971
South metro, MN
|
The timeframe of the use of neonic’s makes sense in species decline.
Do they not use neonicotinoids in the northern states where turkeys are numerous? Yes, we use neonicotinoids up here. Lots of people trying to outlaw them and typically use the honey bee for emotional support/backing. I don't see it having merit as I run about 70 hives next to farmlands that neonics are used. I know of a guy who runs 1500 hives in Manitoba on his Canola farm. He has a success rate that most of us would die for and uses plenty of Neonics right next to his hives...and it's not hard to kill bees. Now I can see someone making an argument along the lines of "application differences" from state to state? ( If there's any difference). I'm not aware of any differences in application mandates....but I wouldn't be a person who would know, in reality. Here in MN. (According to the DNR) we have not seen much of a decline in turkey numbers, other than sporadic talk...actually a steady growth of both turkey and hunters, according to the DNR. Most of the turkeys in this state are located in the Southeast region where farmlands is present amongst mature trees/hills, etc. Last year we harvested a little over 12,000 turkeys in the spring season alone with more hunters than ever before. The DNR claims hunting has no effect on the numbers. MN (at least where most of the turkey are) also have plenty of predators: Coon, skunk and of course coyotes galore. When MN introduced Turkeys decades ago, I remember having some real hard winters. They didn't die off but continued to grow and expand their ranges I don't pretend have any answers...and why I posed the initial question. Thanks for the comments. I find them interesting (in a good way).
|
|
|
|
|