Second Amendment Preservation Act
#7141753
01/17/21 08:33 PM
01/17/21 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 170 Iowa
arcman
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 170
Iowa
|
Did the "Second Amendment Preservation Act" in Missouri ever make it into law?
"Yeah Henry. Yeah, it's up there.. A whole valley full of prime beaver. A man could live easy the rest of his days."
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7141824
01/17/21 09:01 PM
01/17/21 09:01 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 170 Iowa
arcman
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 170
Iowa
|
I know this bill was being voted on last year, but I was wondering if it ever passed. Here is what it says:" SCS/SB 588 - This act establishes the "Second Amendment Preservation Act." Under this act, all federal laws that infringe on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid and shall not be enforced by this state."
"Yeah Henry. Yeah, it's up there.. A whole valley full of prime beaver. A man could live easy the rest of his days."
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7141849
01/17/21 09:13 PM
01/17/21 09:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,101 North East Kansas
Marty
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,101
North East Kansas
|
time to decide that you will defend your rights yourself and not count on one government keeping another government at bay..
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7141852
01/17/21 09:15 PM
01/17/21 09:15 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
Strikes me as superfluous and in some cases unenforceable.
The federal courts are the deciders of the scope of the Second Amendment. If the federal courts uphold the banning of ARs by federal statute, the residents of Missouri won't be granted an exemption by virtue of their own state legislation.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7141872
01/17/21 09:25 PM
01/17/21 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,101 North East Kansas
Marty
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,101
North East Kansas
|
I wonder if England granted an exemption to the citizens of the colonies soo they could revolt?
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: Marty]
#7141879
01/17/21 09:28 PM
01/17/21 09:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,363 Maine, Aroostook
Posco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,363
Maine, Aroostook
|
I wonder if England granted an exemption to the citizens of the colonies soo they could revolt? We won't need anyone's permission or approval.
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: Posco]
#7141881
01/17/21 09:29 PM
01/17/21 09:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 10,773 Iowa
trapdog1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 10,773
Iowa
|
President-elect Joe Biden will be inaugurated in the same spot where insurrectionists waged an assault on the U.S. Capitol just weeks before. Scott Pelley reports on how officials are ensuring the inauguration will be safe.
CBS News on FB. It's been constant. These "news" folks are disgusting liars.
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: trapdog1]
#7141892
01/17/21 09:34 PM
01/17/21 09:34 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,363 Maine, Aroostook
Posco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,363
Maine, Aroostook
|
These "news" folks are disgusting liars. Here's another from CBS. Bill Whitaker speaks with one of the three law enforcement officials who resigned in the wake of the attack on the Capitol, and reports on the threat behind what one expert says "may have been the most predictable terrorist incident in modern American history."
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7142051
01/17/21 10:41 PM
01/17/21 10:41 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,212 McGrath, AK
white17
"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
|
"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,212
McGrath, AK
|
I know this bill was being voted on last year, but I was wondering if it ever passed. Here is what it says:" SCS/SB 588 - This act establishes the "Second Amendment Preservation Act." Under this act, all federal laws that infringe on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid and shall not be enforced by this state." I think some of you are misreading or misunderstanding the language above. Note that it says " federdal laws that infringe on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid and shall not be enforced by this state." It does not say 'will not be enforced IN this state'
Mean As Nails
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: arcman]
#7142074
01/17/21 10:50 PM
01/17/21 10:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,956 Aliceville, Kansas 43
Yukon John
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,956
Aliceville, Kansas 43
|
...in other words, when the Red Dawn military comes for your guns, it's over!
Act like a blank, get treated like a blank. Insert your own blank!
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: il.trapper]
#7142078
01/17/21 10:51 PM
01/17/21 10:51 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,497 Southern NJ
maintenanceguy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,497
Southern NJ
|
James,
Explain something to me. Many states have made elicit drugs legal in their states. Although those same drugs are still deemed illegal by the federal Gov. Yet you said above that a state can't overide the fed. gov. on a gun issue. Why one and not the other.
It is not just drugs either. Several other practices, so to speak, can be done by states, but not others.
Not looking for a fight, just curious as to how this can be. Only because the federal government has chosen not to enforce federal law. They could kick down the doors of every "legal" medical marijuana distribution center if they decided to.
-Ryan
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: Marty]
#7142112
01/17/21 11:05 PM
01/17/21 11:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,568 Wi.
Diggerman
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,568
Wi.
|
I wonder if England granted an exemption to the citizens of the colonies soo they could revolt? There you go, Word up Marty.
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: maintenanceguy]
#7142143
01/17/21 11:21 PM
01/17/21 11:21 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
James,
Explain something to me. Many states have made elicit drugs legal in their states. Although those same drugs are still deemed illegal by the federal Gov. Yet you said above that a state can't overide the fed. gov. on a gun issue. Why one and not the other.
It is not just drugs either. Several other practices, so to speak, can be done by states, but not others.
Not looking for a fight, just curious as to how this can be. Only because the federal government has chosen not to enforce federal law. They could kick down the doors of every "legal" medical marijuana distribution center if they decided to. Right. The feds haven't been enforcing the marijuana prohibition in states that have legalized, for political reasons, I guess. Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: James]
#7142167
01/17/21 11:39 PM
01/17/21 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,628 N. Carolina
Scout1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,628
N. Carolina
|
Strikes me as superfluous and in some cases unenforceable.
The federal courts are the deciders of the scope of the Second Amendment. If the federal courts uphold the banning of ARs by federal statute, the residents of Missouri won't be granted an exemption by virtue of their own state legislation.
Jim Show Me! Edit-think hard on this one James?
Last edited by Scout1; 01/17/21 11:43 PM.
------------------------------------- DJT & MTG in 2024!
|
|
|
Re: Second Amendment Preservation Act
[Re: maintenanceguy]
#7142226
01/18/21 12:16 AM
01/18/21 12:16 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,406 Northeast Oklahoma
Mike in A-town
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,406
Northeast Oklahoma
|
James,
Explain something to me. Many states have made elicit drugs legal in their states. Although those same drugs are still deemed illegal by the federal Gov. Yet you said above that a state can't overide the fed. gov. on a gun issue. Why one and not the other.
It is not just drugs either. Several other practices, so to speak, can be done by states, but not others.
Not looking for a fight, just curious as to how this can be. Only because the federal government has chosen not to enforce federal law. They could kick down the doors of every "legal" medical marijuana distribution center if they decided to. That's likely the case. I also think that perhaps federal manpower isn't up to the task. Hard to make a dent if local/state LE aren't going to.pitch in. I don't know how many DEA doorkickers there are... But there are only about 3000 ATF agents. And only a certain percentage of them are "field" personnel... The rest are tech guys, paper pushers, and managers/policy. I was on a forum where a CLEET instructor stated that almost all of the "bottom of the barrel" graduates went to ATF... He said it was just about like clockwork which agency they would choose to apply to. Mike
One man with a gun may control 100 others who have none.
Vladimir Lenin
|
|
|
|
|