|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: whitfield]
#761409
06/20/08 02:21 PM
06/20/08 02:21 PM
|
Corey Hain
Unregistered
|
Corey Hain
Unregistered
|
Location Location Location, without a doubt.
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: ]
#761410
06/20/08 02:23 PM
06/20/08 02:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
VA
BlueRidgeTrapper
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2007
VA
|
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: BlueRidgeTrapper]
#761418
06/20/08 02:30 PM
06/20/08 02:30 PM
|
Donnie
Unregistered
|
Donnie
Unregistered
|
i say location but know some dang fine trappers that would disagree
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: RockyII]
#761434
06/20/08 02:36 PM
06/20/08 02:36 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
TN
TN_Trapper
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2008
TN
|
If I was a lure maker, I would say lure. If I wrote trapping articles, I would say location.
Brandon
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: TN_Trapper]
#761436
06/20/08 02:37 PM
06/20/08 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Oakland County, MI
RockyII
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2007
Oakland County, MI
|
If I was a lure maker, I would say lure. If I wrote trapping articles, I would say location. Have you ever been in politics? lol
The more I catch, the poorer I get.
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: RockyII]
#761440
06/20/08 02:40 PM
06/20/08 02:40 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2008
montgomery co.,ks
kseric
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2008
montgomery co.,ks
|
ricky cox took the words right out of my mouth.
keep the wind in your face and the sun at your back
YOU DO YOUR THING, I'LL DO MINE
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: whitfield]
#761456
06/20/08 03:02 PM
06/20/08 03:02 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Northwestern New York(Elder)
Jonathan
"Wilson"
|
"Wilson"
Joined: Dec 2006
Northwestern New York(Elder)
|
My experience strongly suggests that "location" is the key operative, with stand alone identity, independent of lure quality (mediocre, or a great one - however that gradient is measured?) The greatest distance any given lure can be operative and effective is if a given animal's olfactory senses are within the boundary of detection, as the the intensity of the wind may influence its compass. Any sniffing organ has limits.
The "lure" component integrated into a set, no matter the status of its acclaimed virtues, is an aloof concept, and will live on in myth in the hearts and minds of many who put it on the pedestal reserved for magic - an illusion.
Any lure, bait or stinkum carefully applied at a set has merit. That is a given. However, think about this in terms of the set-lure/location quotient that may help to analyze an answer to your question. For example: A well made dirt hole for a canine of choice, will and can, function and produce without a speck of lure or bait when located within the perimeter of "location." That is a given, too.
So, with that said, your way of thinking may have just been stimulated. Others will provide different interpretations contrary to mine, but you will ultimately have to answer the question for yourself.
Jonathan
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: whitfield]
#761494
06/20/08 03:42 PM
06/20/08 03:42 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Wisconsin
Blackdog
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2007
Wisconsin
|
Blind sets alone miss ALOT of animals! One needs to take advantage of ALL the tools in the box! Troy
Just ask your mommy...
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: Blackdog]
#761515
06/20/08 03:58 PM
06/20/08 03:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Northwestern New York(Elder)
Jonathan
"Wilson"
|
"Wilson"
Joined: Dec 2006
Northwestern New York(Elder)
|
Troy, That comment is right on location for the discriminating, experienced and flexible trapper. Man cannot live on blind sets alone, he needs lured sets to compliment the spreads between the slices of effort in order for a complete trapper's sandwich to taste the best it possibly can.
Jonathan
Camera Gear: Canon EOS 7D-MK-II, Canon EF-S 10-22mm, EF 28-135mm, EF 100-400mm and EF 400mm lenses.
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: Jonathan]
#761526
06/20/08 04:10 PM
06/20/08 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Goldsboro, North Carolina
Paul Dobbins
"Trapperman custodian"
|
"Trapperman custodian"
Joined: Dec 2006
Goldsboro, North Carolina
|
If the critter isn't where the set is or can't smell the odors of the set, it doesn't matter what the lure is, it ain't gonna work.
If the set is where the critter is and it's not interested in the lure you presented, then the lure does matter.
Gotta have the set in the right place, then you have to have a lure that will make it work the set.
John 14:6 Jesus answered, " I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: Bob Jameson]
#762005
06/21/08 12:18 AM
06/21/08 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
White Sulphur Springs, MT
Terry
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
White Sulphur Springs, MT
|
When I use snares, it is all location, no lure. When I use traps, it is location first, then lure. If there is sign on the other side of the fence and you do not have permission on the other side of the fence, then you cannot set on location and lure might be the difference between pulling or not pulling that animal across the fence and making or not making the catch.
A soft answer turneth away wrath.
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: Terry]
#768862
06/27/08 09:25 AM
06/27/08 09:25 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Ohio
whitfield
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jun 2008
Ohio
|
|
|
|
Re: Is it the lure or the location?
[Re: GritGuy]
#768890
06/27/08 09:58 AM
06/27/08 09:58 AM
|
NYNovice
Unregistered
|
NYNovice
Unregistered
|
Well you have had at least 3 Major Lure makers chime in here. LOL> And they have all told you that without being on a good Location, you won't catch much with any lure. Hal Sullivan has said on here many times, and I believe that he also says it a time or two in his video. "There is NO magic in a Lure Bottle. There is not one lure out there that is going to call all the animals in if they werent there to begin with."
|
|
|
|
|