San Francisco Chronicle
Target: medical research
Debra J Saunders
Thursday, February 14, 2008
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/14/ED5FV178T.DTL

This month opponents of scientific research set off an incendiary
device at the home of Edythe London to protest her medical research at
UCLA. In October, the research opponents flooded London's home. In the
preceding two years, activists left bombs, which failed to ignite,
outside of the home and under the car of UCLA researchers.

Since August, activists have harassed UC Berkeley professors at their
homes late at night and even leafleted the soccer game of a
researcher's child, according to UC Berkeley spokesman Robert Sanders.

Who are these anti-research extremists and why are they waging a
campaign of intimidation against law-abiding scientists?

They are animal-rights activists who oppose medical research with
laboratory animals.

Of course, these activists have a right to their opinion. But they do
not have a right to terrorize researchers - and their children -
because they don't like the way these scientists are working to cure
disease.

"I think it's important to call this terrorism," said Michael Conn,
co-author of book, "The Animal Research War," and associate director
of the Oregon National Primate Research Center. "This is not an effort
to change laws or persuade people. It's an effort to frighten and
intimidate."

Researchers have good reason to be afraid. In 2005, Jerry Vlasak, a
Southern California trauma surgeon and leader of the North American
Animal Liberation Front, which is an animal rights organization, told
a U.S. Senate committee that he could justify killing researchers.
Vlasak said, "I don't think you'd have to kill - assassinate - too
many. I think for five lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save
1 million, 2 million or 10 million nonhuman lives."

Now researchers know that if they dedicate themselves to working on
cures to save lives, they do so at the risk of risk forfeiting their
own.

The scare tactics are working.

In 2005, UCLA researcher Dario Ringach e-mailed Vlasak, "You win."
Ringach pledged to stop animal research.

In 2002, after being targeted and threatened with hundreds of calls,
letters and e-mails by animal rights activists, Michael Podell, a
leading HIV researcher, left Ohio State University and went into
private veterinary practice.

For every Ringach and Podell, there must be many more young scientists
who decide not to become involved in vital medical research because
they don't want to subject their families to the harassment and they
don't want to live their lives in fear.

Conn doesn't understand how a woman can have her home flooded and
torched - because she has is researching nicotine addiction - and
there is no outrage.

Maybe it is because these activists claim that they are acting on
behalf of lab animals that the public doesn't care that these
anonymous bullies are terrorizing good people striving to save lives.

They compare themselves to the Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King
Jr., Conn noted, "But I don't remember Gandhi or King wearing masks
and coming at night, burning houses or threatening children."

He added, "Whoever thought that somebody doing ethical and federally
regulated research would have to live like they're in a war zone?" In
the age of the Internet, which allows activists to intimidate
scientists with complete anonymity and no consequences, it may be time
for universities to build Green Zones for researchers.

E-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com. Note to
readers: My husband, Wesley J. Smith, a senior fellow at the Discovery
Institute, is writing a book critical of the animal rights/liberation
movement.

This article appeared on page B - 7 of the San Francisco Chronicle