Strictly Trapping


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Trading Post
(Please support F&T Trading Post, our sponsor for the Trapping Only Forum)



TrappersPost
Please support Trappers post, a sponsor of the Strictly Trapping Forum



Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 #5213095
09/30/15 09:51 AM
09/30/15 09:51 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,017
Aroostook county, Maine
B
beaver trapper Offline OP
trapper
beaver trapper  Offline OP
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,017
Aroostook county, Maine
Hello guys. I'm looking at getting some coyote traps and need some opinions. I'm getting pressured by some landowners to put the smack down on coyotes and I need some more steel. These 3 traps all fit under our jaw spread requirements. With price and theft in mind, what would you guys go with?

Thanks, Alex


Wilderness, in a word, is freedom
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213098
09/30/15 09:55 AM
09/30/15 09:55 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Victor #3, cheapest, and does its job

Last edited by bridger 1.5; 09/30/15 09:55 AM.

Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213129
09/30/15 10:23 AM
09/30/15 10:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
A #2 Vic round jaw with the forged jaws makes a good reasonable priced coyote trap.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213135
09/30/15 10:30 AM
09/30/15 10:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
#3 Victor , Vic/ Montgomery both work for me...sold all my MB 550's


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213159
09/30/15 10:58 AM
09/30/15 10:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,190
Chauncey, Ohio
W
wormbobskey Offline
trapper
wormbobskey  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,190
Chauncey, Ohio
Anyone of those are good coyote traps. I'd set them up on chained super stakes with all connections welded shut. With around 16-18" of chain their very hard to pull out of the ground without some sort of puller. Very hard for thieves to steal unless they have a puller or shovel.


OSTA
Lanums ADC & Repair
We don't do bugs
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213394
09/30/15 03:35 PM
09/30/15 03:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
I have never tried montys or victors, but I love my mb550s. They hold great. Where theft is a concern, use super stakes, thrives will give up long before they ever get one of those out of the ground.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213414
09/30/15 04:05 PM
09/30/15 04:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
You/ll never get a #3 performance out of a #2 sized trap (550) when it comes to coyotes.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213427
09/30/15 04:13 PM
09/30/15 04:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
I beg to differ Calvin, and so do all the coyotes I've caught in mb550s. I've caught lots of coyotes in both the 550s and the #3 Bridgers and can say from first hand experience the 550 catches just as deep, holds just as solid. I've got pictures to back it up, if you'd like.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213447
09/30/15 04:27 PM
09/30/15 04:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 959
PA
M
mmtrapper Offline
trapper
mmtrapper  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 959
PA
I just bought Bridger # 2 Dogless full mods to try out also !!

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213483
09/30/15 04:57 PM
09/30/15 04:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 862
western Pennsylvania
ducksnbucks36 Offline
trapper
ducksnbucks36  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 862
western Pennsylvania
A 550 will never be a #3. Kinda like the saying a 12 gauge will never be a 10. Essentially an mb550 (based on dimensions) is a suped up bridger 1.65. There's only a 16th difference between the two. Don't get me wrong though it is built like a tank. A #3 has a bigger pan, and kill area. My choice out of the 3 I'd probably choose victor, but if i was getting any type of number 3 or 2 itd be the bridger dogless.

Last edited by ducksnbucks36; 09/30/15 04:58 PM.


Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Calvin] #5213493
09/30/15 05:03 PM
09/30/15 05:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Calvin
You/ll never get a #3 performance out of a #2 sized trap (550) when it comes to coyotes.


X2 ..

Last edited by TNcat; 09/30/15 05:04 PM.

IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213494
09/30/15 05:04 PM
09/30/15 05:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
A
Andrew N. Offline
trapper
Andrew N.  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
I'll vote the #3 montgomery. No dogs to get damaged

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213499
09/30/15 05:07 PM
09/30/15 05:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,738
carolina, Alabama
The Possum Man Offline
trapper
The Possum Man  Offline
trapper

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,738
carolina, Alabama
550 for me. Big fan of the trap...not of the price tag though.


"If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough"
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: mmtrapper] #5213511
09/30/15 05:13 PM
09/30/15 05:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Originally Posted By: mmtrapper
I just bought Bridger # 2 Dogless full mods to try out also !!


#2 bridgers are not Maine legal with out inside laminations , kind of a pain on dogless traps.

Alex, id reccomend the victors or victor/montys. Its what I use up there. I doubt anyone else answering so far has trapped in your neighborhood. I do, and that's what i use. I'd avoid the 550s. You Might also want to look at the Montana predator pro #2's

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213531
09/30/15 05:30 PM
09/30/15 05:30 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 184
ohio
B
Buddy Norris Offline
trapper
Buddy Norris  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 184
ohio
The 550's are built like a tank. I use earth anchors and short chains with at least 3 swivel points with no troubles. Yotes are rough on all equipment . I will be running 6 dz of the 550's pay the money 1 time jmo pay attention to pan tension

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213550
09/30/15 05:48 PM
09/30/15 05:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Victor montys or victor won't go wrong.


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: red mt] #5213556
09/30/15 05:50 PM
09/30/15 05:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted By: red mt
Victor montys or victor won't go wrong.



^^^^^^^^^^

THIS !!!!!


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: red mt] #5213559
09/30/15 05:57 PM
09/30/15 05:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,777
central Illinois
yoteguts Offline
trapper
yoteguts  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,777
central Illinois
Originally Posted By: red mt
Victor montys or victor won't go wrong.


X 2




I'm itchin' to see a coyote twitchin'.

More trappin' and less yappin'.



Member FTA & USSA.





Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213749
09/30/15 08:05 PM
09/30/15 08:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,738
carolina, Alabama
The Possum Man Offline
trapper
The Possum Man  Offline
trapper

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,738
carolina, Alabama
it hurts when traps get stolen regardless of how much they cost though. Only had one stolen so far...and i believe i know the man who did it. But when asked to his face he denied it...No proof..other than i tracked him straight back to his house...unless it was one of his sons which is possible. But they are all grown men and notorious crooks.


"If you're gonna be stupid you better be tough"
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5213766
09/30/15 08:15 PM
09/30/15 08:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: Bob
I beg to differ Calvin, and so do all the coyotes I've caught in mb550s. I've caught lots of coyotes in both the 550s and the #3 Bridgers and can say from first hand experience the 550 catches just as deep, holds just as solid. I've got pictures to back it up, if you'd like.


I've tested plenty of traps over the years...including the 550. It's a nice #2 sized trap. I use them for coon now. My 650s are used for coyotes...no comparison.

But to each his own...and quit taking pics of catches about 30 years ago.

Last edited by Calvin; 09/30/15 08:17 PM.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5213781
09/30/15 08:22 PM
09/30/15 08:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Every once in great while a pic
On the pics x2 calvin


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214357
10/01/15 08:39 AM
10/01/15 08:39 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Sold all my #3 in 2009 when after to many times where the mechanics of the trap failed and the loose jaw stuck in the open position and another high dollar western cat walked away.

MB 550's and loads of critters later and "snap"... "gotcha" every time each time a paw hits the pan gives the 550's the CLEAR edge. No comparison on results if you're skilled at showing animals where to step.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: ] #5214369
10/01/15 08:48 AM
10/01/15 08:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Originally Posted By: Mark June
Sold all my #3 in 2009 when after to many times where the mechanics of the trap failed and the loose jaw stuck in the open position and another high dollar western cat walked away.

MB 550's and loads of critters later and "snap"... "gotcha" every time each time a paw hits the pan gives the 550's the CLEAR edge. No comparison on results if you're skilled at showing animals where to step.

If I was in a high theft area though I don't know if I would want my 550s set there. I would rather have a bone stock cheaper victor, that will still hold coyotes, then a 550 set in a high theft area


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: ] #5214542
10/01/15 12:31 PM
10/01/15 12:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Originally Posted By: Mark June
Sold all my #3 in 2009 when after to many times where the mechanics of the trap failed and the loose jaw stuck in the open position and another high dollar western cat walked away.

MB 550's and loads of critters later and "snap"... "gotcha" every time each time a paw hits the pan gives the 550's the CLEAR edge. No comparison on results if you're skilled at showing animals where to step.


Yep, my sediments exactly!


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214551
10/01/15 12:35 PM
10/01/15 12:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
If your in a high theft area use two chain stakes, one straight down and one at a 45 degree angle. Theives are lazy and will give up trying to dig em up.


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: trappergbus] #5214636
10/01/15 02:02 PM
10/01/15 02:02 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: trappergbus
If your in a high theft area use two chain stakes, one straight down and one at a 45 degree angle. Theives are lazy and will give up trying to dig em up.


Trappergbus,

Smilin' as I'm reading your post. I like it! I can just see those scoundrels yanking and tugging and nothing to steal on your line! You and I think alike. The ol' Michigan born and breed trapper in me has done similar to what you describe many times and it's the way to set the line up on your terms so that you maximize the catch.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214661
10/01/15 02:23 PM
10/01/15 02:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
To the original poster.
Alex, don't buy into the 550 hype. There are better options for your situation. I know of at least one lynx that spent the night at the vets last season thanks to a 550. Not true of the other ones that I know that were caught in other traps. There's alot of shortcomings to the 550 that most people dont see or choose to ignore.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5214744
10/01/15 03:51 PM
10/01/15 03:51 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: coon grease
To the original poster.
Alex, don't buy into the 550 hype. There are better options for your situation. I know of at least one lynx that spent the night at the vets last season thanks to a 550. Not true of the other ones that I know that were caught in other traps. There's alot of shortcomings to the 550 that most people dont see or choose to ignore.


Coon Grease,

Your comments don't hold water as the 550 is the fastest selling predator trap on the market for a reason... it works. Fair balance is.. so do the Victors and the Montys but they need to be retooled to = the 550's. I've used them all and there's no way I'll ever set a #3 again as they misfire too often. Montys are not too bad but not good enough. I understand that folks don't want stuff stolen, and setting cheaper rigs in high theft areas is a solid plan in that case.

CG, You must have my name on your search criteria as each time I post, you disagree wink.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214779
10/01/15 04:26 PM
10/01/15 04:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Sorry mark. Dont flatter yourself. I'm only arguing with you because you are wrong. And my opinion of the 550 is consistent. Its an overbuilt mid size trap. And has the same draw backs as other 1.75 traps. It is versatile and serviceable for alot of applications. But doesn't really excel at any aplication. Actually 550's are less valuable than standard 1.75 traps because although they are billed as a multi species trap, they aren't. Ever catch a mink or muskrat in a 550? Didn't think so, but piles of them each year are caught in comprable sized traps with effiecint pan tension adjustment. But Alex asked about coyote traps. As far as being a best seller, well I hope that isn't that new standard of quality or I guess Jakes, coyote cuffs, LPC long springs, and sterlings are all inferior to your beloved 550's. And let's not even mention all the fast selling, lures and baits that any on who has actually used knows are junk. Fox urine anybody? Lol

I'm still trying to figure out this thing you are saying about misfires?


Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214791
10/01/15 04:48 PM
10/01/15 04:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Alex, here's another one to consider. Some number three dukes are pretty close to the 5 3/8 inside requirement. I cant remember who said it so I apologize to whoever's idea it is. But someone said that if you bend the jaws tips up on 3 duke you can decrease the inside spread and make them legal. I've even heard of giving the jaws a good smack with a hammer with the trap in the closed position. Yes they are that close to being legal. And remember the #3 victor or monty with regular jaws is too big but the offsets measure just right. My vote still goes to the Victor #3. Add one swivel and its legal. Even the montys need changed to a center swivel point.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: ] #5214794
10/01/15 04:52 PM
10/01/15 04:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Mark, I'm glad ya liked it, and maximizeing the catch is what its all about. I also 4 coil some in possible theft spots to make it even harder LOL. I do not pass up hot locations because of possible theft! My local warden loves it! And you are correct there is no equal to the 550 when all is realistaclly considered. No more trap mechanics, modification and mantanence, when they snap the animal is yours. They also take alot less waxed dirt to bed!!

Hope you are healing well, Gary


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214808
10/01/15 05:01 PM
10/01/15 05:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
IMO trappers fault not the trap when it doesn't perform up to par ....


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214815
10/01/15 05:08 PM
10/01/15 05:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,235
montana
A
andy weiser Offline
trapper
andy weiser  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 4,235
montana
I've been reading along on this thread just like I have on many threads here lately. Been keeping my opinions to myself cause I don't want involved in any unnecessary arguments. I've used every cast jawed trap ever made. Seen No damage and seen beyond damage. Give me my $150 per dozen #3 Monty's stock right out of the box and I'll show you a pile of caught coyotes with minimal damage. Over and out.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: andy weiser] #5214826
10/01/15 05:23 PM
10/01/15 05:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted By: andy weiser
I've been reading along on this thread just like I have on many threads here lately. Been keeping my opinions to myself cause I don't want involved in any unnecessary arguments. I've used every cast jawed trap ever made. Seen No damage and seen beyond damage. Give me my $150 per dozen #3 Monty's stock right out of the box and I'll show you a pile of caught coyotes with minimal damage. Over and out.


Good post Andy !!!


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214853
10/01/15 06:17 PM
10/01/15 06:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
sligo pa
R
randy5 Offline
trapper
randy5  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
sligo pa
andy when u say mongomery #3 are u talking about the new mongomery/victor makes the round jaws with dogless pan just wondering I seen them but never put my hands on them just seeing how they are good or bad thanks

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214923
10/01/15 07:09 PM
10/01/15 07:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
CG, why the vendetta against 550s? I've used them for years, caught fox, coyote, and coon in them and have nothing but good things to say about them.

What's wrong with this? Every coyote I catch in one is held just like this one, never had a misfire, snapped in the bed, damage to the foot, or any problems out of them at all



"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5214928
10/01/15 07:16 PM
10/01/15 07:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
I think his point is they aren't as versatile has other traps on the market


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215116
10/01/15 09:24 PM
10/01/15 09:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,657
Mountain View, AR
S
ShaneT Offline
trapper
ShaneT  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,657
Mountain View, AR
I've never used the 550's. I am gonna get some to try. My main concern with them right now is pan tension and grey fox.

With all I have heard about them from so many different people I just got to try them out.


"Good Lord, thank you for your endless bounty. Lord please give me the strength to gather what I need"
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215156
10/01/15 09:42 PM
10/01/15 09:42 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Bob,

Good post and proof is in the pudding. Trappers using MBs by the fist full is a result of 6 years of word of mouth and that's not discounting other types of traps... it's just saying that predator trappers find these traps well suited for today's environment. I used Victor #3N (they were state issued) when I first started but I don't used them today and it is a VERY political world that all must think about. I've sat in a state senate hearing with Ingrid Newkirk crying on cue and showing traps up close and bloody and I tell ya it gets attention. Would I use a Victor #3N in today's farm lots.. NO! Would I ever use them... SURE, maybe in the Sand Hills with no domestics and such. It's one thing to talk about larger traps on private ground, behind locked gates, on high fence ground, etc. and another thing to use bigger on 80 acres where Ruddy's beagle blunders into it. We must think about these things as trappers! Not saying that one trap hurts more than another cause all traps can cause damage but smaller is a better "fit" for smaller animals that are not meant to be caught.

Coon Grease, I have NEVER told another TMan contributor that they are wrong sir. Wrong? There are no judges, juries, and executioners on here my friend and when someone makes a valid point in a valid way, glad to know you're able to decipher right from wrong. Priceless as usual.

Andy, have never used the #3 Montys but almost did the year the MB 550 and 650 came out. I respect your opinion as you would not use gear that didn't hold up day after day, sunup till sun down. Good to know. I have customers who love their Montys!

Trap preferences are individual in nature and can be regional or state/local specific. There's a reason for trap size regs and it'd be a great thing if there weren't as many regs passed down from on high in the future.

Mark

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: randy5] #5215281
10/01/15 10:48 PM
10/01/15 10:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 724
Niobrara Nebraska
J
jjbathke2001 Offline
trapper
jjbathke2001  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 724
Niobrara Nebraska
Originally Posted By: randy5
andy when u say mongomery #3 are u talking about the new mongomery/victor makes the round jaws with dogless pan just wondering I seen them but never put my hands on them just seeing how they are good or bad thanks


Andy showed me these last year and there an awesome trap for the money. Drill one hole out for center swivel and there even better. Never had a sprung trap that didn't have a critter last year. There the new dog less monty/vic.


There is no try or try not, only a coyote in the trap or not.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215298
10/01/15 11:01 PM
10/01/15 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
I started out using bridger #3s and I still love them. Fully modified and tricked out they're awesome as a coyote trap. BUT! there are a lot of areas I don't feel comfortable using such a big heavy trap, for fear of catching a dog or a cat or whatever. I don't care who you are, that 550 is a whole heck of a lot easier on a barn cats leg than a #3 sized trap. This is where the 550 shines. I feel a lot better about it using the 550 because I know that (because I've been there and done that) it will be far better for non targets. A coyote can take a #3 bridger and you can turn him loose and he can keep on trucking. A house cat, not so much. Plus, it makes people that I meet along the way feel a bit better seeing the little 550 as opposed to a #3, because they do look intimidating.

I love both traps, I use both every year. They each have a use on my line, but tell you the truth I find myself setting more 550s than anything else. They just fit the bill in so many ways.

Like you said mark, proof is in the pudding. To each their own, I'm not faulting anyone for using whatever it is they like to use, just wanted to defend the 550 a little because they're a heap better than some on this thread was givin them credit for. It isn't hype. There's a reason they don't come up for sale on the trap shed often, and I've never seen any used ones for sale at a convention.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215389
10/02/15 12:53 AM
10/02/15 12:53 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Got me all wrong bob. No vendetta here. Just calling it like I see it. Alex asked about our opinions of three different traps. I have used all three and have used them where he lives. I dont think the 550 is the best option. 4 3/4 inside jaw spread on a coyote trap? Look at that trap in the set position and visualize a coyotes foot. Its pretty hard to get a coyotes paw on that pan without it also being on the jaws somewhere. This is the reason I'm a little puzzled by the comments about misfires with bigger traps?...if 550s are what a guy feels comfortable with, use them. I don't care. But don't take my word for it. Seek out a high numbers coyote trapper, a real killer with lots of production and ask them their opinion of the 550's.

Interesting you mention the 3ns mark. I don't own many but i would certainly not hesitate to set them anywhere and would never expect them to be too bad on foot damage. After all, they are about the same size as a 1.75 and have smooth cast offset jaws. Lots in common with the 550's.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215402
10/02/15 01:40 AM
10/02/15 01:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 91
western maine
D
dougG270 Offline
trapper
dougG270  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 91
western maine
I personally like the 550 but I'm a mix line guy. If I was going to be setting for soley coyotes I would look for a larger trap that was the quality of the 550, if I couldn't find it I would stay with the 550. A word of caution about running traps really close to max width, your measuring tape may not be the same as the wardens and guess whos tape matters.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215403
10/02/15 01:40 AM
10/02/15 01:40 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,777
central Illinois
yoteguts Offline
trapper
yoteguts  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,777
central Illinois
I've ran both and greatly prefer the vic/monty #3. They keep changing the jaws on the 550 and I've seen foot damage . Always had good feet in the vic/montys. The foot is so deep in this trap when they fire it 99% of the time there toes are still on the pan. Just because a trap is popular doesnt make it the best choice for everyone. Different strokes for different folks I guess.






Last edited by yoteguts; 10/02/15 01:41 AM.



I'm itchin' to see a coyote twitchin'.

More trappin' and less yappin'.



Member FTA & USSA.





Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215423
10/02/15 05:19 AM
10/02/15 05:19 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
FOXCATCHER Offline
trapper
FOXCATCHER  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
Here is my two cents, for what it's worth. I started my trapping life as a tiny trap guy as one guy would say. I had nothing but tricked out 1.75s and caught a bunch if coyotes with them. Using the smaller trap early in my career helped me with trapping fundamentals.

About 3 years into this trapping thing I bought my first dozen victor #3 round jaws offset. My catch increased dramatically!!! I was using them stock at first so I did see some damage. After some laminations and shorter chains that was quickly eliminated. I kept some of my tricked out Duke and Victor 1.75s for the high theft areas since they were not eating anything hanging in the shed. They served their purpose well. Lost several of those 1.75s over the years but caught a few ocean liner loads of fur in places I might have passed up. I still used my #3s behind locked gates as Mark put it. This does NOT mean I didn't have my run ins with farmer's dogs. With everyone of my #3s that caught the farmer's dogs there was ZERO damage.

Fast forward to about 5 years ago. I had made up my mind to give the 550s an honest try. I bought two dozen new and traded for a dozen that was a year old according to the previous owner. I worked them into my line just as I would my #3s. I had high hopes and was almost dead set on retooling my whole line with 550s. I read so many reviews and saw so many pics on here that I was certain the Cavens had a fairy sprinkling magic dust on them before being shipped.

Then it started. Sprung traps with nothing in them. I mean more empty traps set off after being worked by a coyote. No nontargets, but tracks-in-the-pattern proof of coyotes. I have NEVER had much issue with bedding, or set construction. Remember, I learned with little traps so my set construction had to be above average. I was worried!!! I tried everything. I'm sure it was something I was doing wrong but could not figure it out.

Now, there comes a point that, when you are a part time trapper, you have to give up. Why change what was working so well???? Something with the heavy cast jaws, weak springs and that PawsiTrip system just wasn't working for me. Not sure what but most of those 550s have found new homes. And yes, several 550s DO show up on the trap shed every couple weeks so the next victim can learn a lesson. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they have their place and some trappers DO use them effectively. Just not me and I don't have time to try to learn.

Fast forward to two years ago. I made a deal on the Trap Shed with Rob (yoteguts) for a few fully modded new model Monty #3 and #4s. I set them that following season and they worked like a charm!!!! Those new style Montys are great for my style and methods. I also like my Bridger #3s too.

As far as taking advise on line goes, I have received great advise here over the years. I also have tried some things that just didn't work for ME. Was their methods right or wrong?? Not necessarily. It just didn't work for me.

Coongrease, while I agree on your stance on this issue, you contradict yourself by advising trappers to take advise from high number coyote guys. Mark has probably trapped more coyotes in a two week stretch than most will trap in a season or two. He makes the traps work for him. Some of us just don't have the time to work those issues out. I have about 4-5 hours a day to run hard. If a guy runs all day he has a little more room for error.

Don

Last edited by FOXCATCHER; 10/02/15 05:30 AM.

With it or on it. A way of life

There's a lot of smart people, far fewer wise men... NonPCfed
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215613
10/02/15 10:11 AM
10/02/15 10:11 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,856
Pa
W
Wright Brothers Online content
trapper
Wright Brothers  Online Content
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,856
Pa
When 550s first came out I handled ONE.
Right away I saw a couple of things I didn't like.
I handled ONE 450 the other day and it seemed improved.

Did the maker take criticism wisely and make changes?
If so, smart man.

I like the Vic 3 just fine.

The newer Mont I have no experience so wont say but can say the old high levered model was ahead of it's time.

They are just traps, buy some each and try em.





Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215639
10/02/15 10:35 AM
10/02/15 10:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
I wonder what could have been causing that, Don? Seems weird to me, I have never, not one single time, had a 550 with tracks on it and no catch. Never had anything pull out of one, never had one miss. Maybe I just got lucky but I haven't seen a single one of the problems you experienced, and I've got about 6 dozen 550s. its not like I bought two to try out, I've been running them hard for four years and they've outperformed every other stock trap I have.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: FOXCATCHER] #5215649
10/02/15 10:43 AM
10/02/15 10:43 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 23
Central Indiana
J
jstetter83 Offline
trapper
jstetter83  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 23
Central Indiana
Originally Posted By: FOXCATCHER
Here is my two cents, for what it's worth. I started my trapping life as a tiny trap guy as one guy would say. I had nothing but tricked out 1.75s and caught a bunch if coyotes with them. Using the smaller trap early in my career helped me with trapping fundamentals.

About 3 years into this trapping thing I bought my first dozen victor #3 round jaws offset. My catch increased dramatically!!! I was using them stock at first so I did see some damage. After some laminations and shorter chains that was quickly eliminated. I kept some of my tricked out Duke and Victor 1.75s for the high theft areas since they were not eating anything hanging in the shed. They served their purpose well. Lost several of those 1.75s over the years but caught a few ocean liner loads of fur in places I might have passed up. I still used my #3s behind locked gates as Mark put it. This does NOT mean I didn't have my run ins with farmer's dogs. With everyone of my #3s that caught the farmer's dogs there was ZERO damage.

Fast forward to about 5 years ago. I had made up my mind to give the 550s an honest try. I bought two dozen new and traded for a dozen that was a year old according to the previous owner. I worked them into my line just as I would my #3s. I had high hopes and was almost dead set on retooling my whole line with 550s. I read so many reviews and saw so many pics on here that I was certain the Cavens had a fairy sprinkling magic dust on them before being shipped.

Then it started. Sprung traps with nothing in them. I mean more empty traps set off after being worked by a coyote. No nontargets, but tracks-in-the-pattern proof of coyotes. I have NEVER had much issue with bedding, or set construction. Remember, I learned with little traps so my set construction had to be above average. I was worried!!! I tried everything. I'm sure it was something I was doing wrong but could not figure it out.

Now, there comes a point that, when you are a part time trapper, you have to give up. Why change what was working so well???? Something with the heavy cast jaws, weak springs and that PawsiTrip system just wasn't working for me. Not sure what but most of those 550s have found new homes. And yes, several 550s DO show up on the trap shed every couple weeks so the next victim can learn a lesson. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure they have their place and some trappers DO use them effectively. Just not me and I don't have time to try to learn.

Fast forward to two years ago. I made a deal on the Trap Shed with Rob (yoteguts) for a few fully modded new model Monty #3 and #4s. I set them that following season and they worked like a charm!!!! Those new style Montys are great for my style and methods. I also like my Bridger #3s too.

As far as taking advise on line goes, I have received great advise here over the years. I also have tried some things that just didn't work for ME. Was their methods right or wrong?? Not necessarily. It just didn't work for me.

Coongrease, while I agree on your stance on this issue, you contradict yourself by advising trappers to take advise from high number coyote guys. Mark has probably trapped more coyotes in a two week stretch than most will trap in a season or two. He makes the traps work for him. Some of us just don't have the time to work those issues out. I have about 4-5 hours a day to run hard. If a guy runs all day he has a little more room for error.

Don


I've had great support from Mr. June and try to read everything he writes... With that said, I am to inexperienced to have an opinion, but thought that someone should certainly say thank you to FOXCATCHER (Don)... A lot of ppl on here hassle and hate... Don, you gave credit where due and also provided great insight for us new guys... just letting you know your response was refreshing and educating...

Thanks a million,
Jered

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: FOXCATCHER] #5215768
10/02/15 12:02 PM
10/02/15 12:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Don, were the empty 550's still in the bed or did coyotes pull out? I'm puzzled by the empty fired 550's, Ive been running them for 6 years and have only lost 1 coyote out of many. One thing that comes to mind is did you tighten up the dog eye? If there is to much slop in the dog eye the heat and cold causes expansion and contraction can cause fired traps in the bed. Help me understand.

I always tighten the dog eye with any dog on trap to eliminate this.


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215783
10/02/15 12:19 PM
10/02/15 12:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
Taximan Offline
trapper
Taximan  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
Regarding the OP's original question,if the landowners are applying pressure to kill coyotes,they should apply it in the form of cash and theft shouldn't be the trapper's problem.Then,just use the trap you think will work the best for you,whatever that is.

Regarding the MB 550,my experience mirror's Bob's.
"I wonder what could have been causing that, Don? Seems weird to me, I have never, not one single time, had a 550 with tracks on it and no catch. Never had anything pull out of one, never had one miss. Maybe I just got lucky but I haven't seen a single one of the problems you experienced, and I've got about 6 dozen 550s. its not like I bought two to try out, I've been running them hard for four years and they've outperformed every other stock trap I have."

Except for changing the chain/swivel setup to suit me,I've only used mine stock,just as they come and all are two coiled.So far,every catch has been a full,above the pad catch,no damage,no misses or set off traps.I rarely measure pan tension but whatever it is on these,is working the way I like it.I have sets that are danced on nightly by cottontails and so far,none have fired the traps but they still catch any fox or any size bobcat that steps on one.Interestingly,there is a thread going on right now about pan tension on the 550's and many are trying to reduce it.I always keep my pan tension at a point where those cottontails and smaller animals can't fire them and these have worked well in that regard.

Regarding jaw spread,the 550's jaw spread is identical to the Victor 3N which has been used by government men to take hundreds of thousands of coyotes over many decades.I believe more jawspread can give you some slight advantage but 5 1/2" isn't too bad.For my situation,choosing a trap size is trying to balance size and strength against weight carried and the size trap bed I have to chop in frozen ground.If I had my way,the 550 would have a 6" jawspread,without changing anything else.
There was a time when a trap with a 6 1/2" jawspread would have been called a #4.The number designation isn't important.Makers change that all the time.The only thing that matters is if it works for it's intended purpose.

As for power,that hasn't been an issue either.My first ones were 4 coiled and as soon as I set one,I immediately removed all the extra coils for two reasons.One,to make them easier to set with my hands and I also knew that 4 coiled,they were much more likely to hold a lion.Unfortunately,one of the two coil 550's still held a lion.The good news is,it released itself just as I got up on it but not before leveling a lot of landscape.That's the only lion that found one so far but I believe most will be able to pull out and that's important to me as well.In the past,I've had lions blow the jaws out of traps,bow frames and damage dogs but this particular trap was in good shape and could be reset.

I also don't have unlimited time and that's another reason I got the MB550's-I just haven't had to work on them.I've yet to see a trap that I thought was perfect but at least for my needs,the MB 550's are a darn good trap,probably the best I've owned.

Here are a few pictures.These weren't cherry picked,just a few that I took when I thought about it.This is typical of what I've seen with these traps.Not the lever lock up on these.




Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215871
10/02/15 01:35 PM
10/02/15 01:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Does anyone know one of the top numbers men who uses 550's?
How about anyone who has to catch or kill predators for a living , who relies on 550's?

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5215879
10/02/15 01:43 PM
10/02/15 01:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Well I know the top fox man In the country uses #2 vics with forged jaws. And has stated that they work just fine on coyotes.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5216004
10/02/15 04:02 PM
10/02/15 04:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Sir, What number would qualify as a top number? And what do you base that number on?


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216010
10/02/15 04:07 PM
10/02/15 04:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
FOXCATCHER Offline
trapper
FOXCATCHER  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
Thanks for the kind words jstetter.


Bob and others, I'm usually pretty good at trouble shooting empty trap problems. These were definitely pull out issues. Some would be a very light catch circle, some looked like they went to the end of the chain about 2-3 times before pulling out. Had a few toe nails or single toes. This usually indicates too light of pan tension. I considered 4 coiling to up the pan tension but want the coons and foxes that came by. I know I bent the dog to get a little more pan tension out of the box.

That was another issue I had. The stainless rod dog wanted to bend at the eye where the flat part went to round. I didn't want to have to lock every one in a vise to get the dog bent right. I know it's minor but I just like to use two pair of pliers to make the adjustment because I won't have a vise in the field

Also, when I would have a coyote in the 550s, he also found that as a weak point and the dog would be bent at that spot. The round part would be straight but the trap would not set because the dog was bottoming out against the jaws. Now I'm no stranger to bending dogs as it's one of the downfalls of my other #3s that are not dogless so in a head to head comparison that part was a wash.

Don't get me wrong guys, these are solid traps and if I was running a live market hard I might take the time to work out my issues. Once again I am stressing the issue is probably between me and the trap and that's why I switched back to a method that works for me.


With it or on it. A way of life

There's a lot of smart people, far fewer wise men... NonPCfed
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: jstetter83] #5216520
10/02/15 10:33 PM
10/02/15 10:33 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: jstetter83
With that said, I am to inexperienced to have an opinion, but thought that someone should certainly say thank you to FOXCATCHER (Don)... A lot of ppl on here hassle and hate... Don, you gave credit where due and also provided great insight for us new guys... just letting you know your response was refreshing and educating...

Thanks a million,
Jered


X2

Originally Posted By: Taximan


Regarding jaw spread,the 550's jaw spread is identical to the Victor 3N which has been used by government men to take hundreds of thousands of coyotes over many decades.I believe more jawspread can give you some slight advantage but 5 1/2" isn't too bad.For my situation,choosing a trap size is trying to balance size and strength against weight carried and the size trap bed I have to chop in frozen ground.If I had my way,the 550 would have a 6" jawspread,without changing anything else.
There was a time when a trap with a 6 1/2" jawspread would have been called a #4.The number designation isn't important.Makers change that all the time.The only thing that matters is if it works for it's intended purpose.


X2 also...

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: trappergbus] #5216560
10/02/15 11:16 PM
10/02/15 11:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Originally Posted By: trappergbus
Sir, What number would qualify as a top number? And what do you base that number on?


Over 800 per year and over 1000 at least one time.
I'm not going to mention his name but he does post here. Most of us know who He Is and can attest to those numbers.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5216596
10/03/15 12:30 AM
10/03/15 12:30 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Originally Posted By: coon grease
Does anyone know one of the top numbers men who uses 550's?
How about anyone who has to catch or kill predators for a living , who relies on 550's?



Yup. Still waiting

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5216684
10/03/15 07:11 AM
10/03/15 07:11 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Originally Posted By: coon grease
Originally Posted By: coon grease
Does anyone know one of the top numbers men who uses 550's?
How about anyone who has to catch or kill predators for a living , who relies on 550's?



Yup. Still waiting


I know some CG and you would too if you asked around. Personally as a trapper who is involved in coyote research projects (I'll be in AL starting this month to catch yotes for UGA with Rusty Johnson) and high fence paying jobs all year long in multiple states... as well as fur trapping different states during legal seasons, there's a MONSTROUS difference between setting fewer traps on a predation contract and hauling my fanny over a lot of ground trying to pile up pelts. Sometimes it's 6 traps job and sometimes it's 250 leg holds on a place... wide variable. That's trapping... variables. That's why the preference of traps is varied and there is no PERFECT answer. Never can be. Different gear perhaps for different situations makes sense. MOST wolfers like me have variable gear for variable situations and the main theme I think is that today's gear has come a long way in the 40+ years I've trapped. I'm 58 years old and the gear I have in my truck/UTV today is vastly BETTER in many ways than when I was 18. From the cordless drill and auger to the buggie, to my truck, to my traps. Can't find a hammer worth a lick but you get the picture. Use what works and keep an open mind. You don't like something, cool. You prefer it, good deal.

When I meet a trapper with drive in his/her heart and an open mind for new ideas, I know I've found a serious trapper. Lee Steinmeyer is here at the KS show and is one such example! The man has gear that is novel and intriguing and top of the line! Hate to have him on the next ranch over cause the competition level he'd bring to the wolfer game would be real.

Ever moving, ever evolving... that is the sport of trapping. And it's a good thing.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216757
10/03/15 08:59 AM
10/03/15 08:59 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
You are a wolfer? Wait, then you say trapping is a sport? Which is it?

Bottom line, there isn't a single high numbers professional who uses mb 550s. And it only makes sense to emulate success. That's all I said. You can put your twist on it all you want. Actually I'm the one with the open mind here and I'm trying to encourage others to do the same and use common sense. You suggest asking around. So do I! But I suggest asking people who are legitimate top producers.

I have to ask since you opened this can of worms. How does a"wolfer" like you go about doing all of this ADC work, when you are camped out at every convention all summer and spring?

Koolaid anyone?

Who is one single high numbers trapper who uses 550's ? Don't tell me its a secret like all ofnyhe imaginary urine collection facilities.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216804
10/03/15 09:51 AM
10/03/15 09:51 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 74
N.W. Missouri
S
Swivel Offline
trapper
Swivel  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 74
N.W. Missouri
Coon grease. I gotta ask. Since you are attempting to run off a great trapper and teacher. How many coyotes have you caught?

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216813
10/03/15 09:55 AM
10/03/15 09:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Not running anyone off. Open your mind and think.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216833
10/03/15 10:11 AM
10/03/15 10:11 AM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
The bottom line is that we have the best trap choices in history. Downright state of the art. All have different preference and situations. The choice in the end is yours and yours alone. In my situation trapping around subdivisions I choose MB550,450. Do I feel handycapped, Nope. I alter my sets, and trap placement were they want to step. Adapt, I'm done


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216840
10/03/15 10:17 AM
10/03/15 10:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
sligo pa
R
randy5 Offline
trapper
randy5  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 353
sligo pa
x2 like to hear the answer

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216851
10/03/15 10:25 AM
10/03/15 10:25 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 126
INDIANA
B
brandon170 Offline
trapper
brandon170  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 126
INDIANA
If like to hear where all the secret urine collection facilities are.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216856
10/03/15 10:27 AM
10/03/15 10:27 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Asking how many coyotes one catches doesn't mean anything.

Has any one run day after day with with any trapper who posts on here? How do we know how many the so called experts catch In a season and who really cares.
It's all about what you catch not some one else.

Teaching?? I hear a lot of Ideas and opinions stated by 100s of trappers on here. It's up to you to sift through these ideas and opinions and come up with a system that works for you.

Certain traps or some system may work for Mark June but totally fail for someone else.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5216898
10/03/15 11:25 AM
10/03/15 11:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,777
WI
I
Ice_Rat Offline
trapper
Ice_Rat  Offline
trapper
I

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,777
WI
Originally Posted By: coon grease
You are a wolfer? Wait, then you say trapping is a sport? Which is it?

Bottom line, there isn't a single high numbers professional who uses mb 550s. And it only makes sense to emulate success. That's all I said. You can put your twist on it all you want. Actually I'm the one with the open mind here and I'm trying to encourage others to do the same and use common sense. You suggest asking around. So do I! But I suggest asking people who are legitimate top producers.

I have to ask since you opened this can of worms. How does a"wolfer" like you go about doing all of this ADC work, when you are camped out at every convention all summer and spring?

Koolaid anyone?

Who is one single high numbers trapper who uses 550's ? Don't tell me its a secret like all ofnyhe imaginary urine collection facilities.


Gees Louise you come off as a complete phallus.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216915
10/03/15 12:00 PM
10/03/15 12:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
Taximan Offline
trapper
Taximan  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
The best coyote men I've known were very set in their ways when it came to traps and many other things.Their go to traps were #3 and 3N Victors mainly and they couldn't stand the thoughts of using a coil spring.And they made those old long springs work-no mods,nothing.It's what they were used to and they were efficient with them because of that.

A person could learn a ton from those guys but there choice in traps is just that,their choice.Use what suits your way of doing things and don't try to emulate anyone.These guys didn't.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216979
10/03/15 01:39 PM
10/03/15 01:39 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 238
nw mn
haroldlcasey Offline
trapper
haroldlcasey  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2014
Posts: 238
nw mn
well said Taxi.


HlC234
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5216990
10/03/15 01:55 PM
10/03/15 01:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
FOXCATCHER Offline
trapper
FOXCATCHER  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,464
Southern Indiana
I will say this, the two top coyote guys I have talked to in Southern Indiana use/used 1 3/4 traps. Not sure how they would feel about the 550s.

One is Jerry Joe Barnett, whom last I checked used stock Sleepy Creek 1 3/4s. And an old retired coyote trapper Adrian Stafford. He used northwoods 1 3/4s. I bought about 3-4 dozen of his traps when he retired just because they had seen so many coyotes.

Don


With it or on it. A way of life

There's a lot of smart people, far fewer wise men... NonPCfed
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5218296
10/04/15 05:40 PM
10/04/15 05:40 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



FOXCATCHER,

What! Top Wolfers using 1.75's!! That's blasphemy to a few on this thread!!! Wolfers MUST use heavy gear and sleep under the stars to qualify as legit. Others are not worthy of the mantle. You list a man that is one of two individuals who got me to consider the newer (at the time) coil spring traps for my coyote trap line; Jerry Joe Barnett. He is a very special man with very special talent who is a treasure to trappers and trapping. The other man is Pete Askins who also is a treasure to all of us trappers. The early 1980's, when I was a FTA college had those 2 gents really putting the bug in all of our ears that smaller could get the job done if you fenced the set correctly and paid attention to detail. Those two men know their stuff, period. Based on my respect for Jerry Joe and Pete (and others) I personally went about revising my gear from double staked, shock springs, long chain traps to smaller traps with cable stakes and no shock springs. Much less equipment and very good results, just as they suggested! Go figure.

Coon Grease, I think you'd have a tough time understanding how some individuals run and gun and get the job done. Ask anyone who knows me or has been in the shop or on my line with me and they will tell you we get MANY things done where others would be wondering how to do it all. I don't do much ADC in the summertime, don't want to anymore. Been there, done that and most damage isn't done to stock in the summer sir. Not much at all. Nickle dime in the summer sir. Springtime is when most predation occurs and all heck breaks loose and I'm hand over fist busy then.

FYI, this year I'll start week after next in AL for a coyote research project (we worked it last year also) and state hop from there until the calving/exotic/meat goat/high fence predation and paying jobs settles down. Oh, and all that work will have 550's in the ground or cam locks on snares or .223 and a predator call. Pete and Jerry Joe would concur.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5218350
10/04/15 06:44 PM
10/04/15 06:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
C'mon boys I just popped the popcorn.
Keep er goin.

Last edited by Boco; 10/04/15 06:44 PM.

Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5218396
10/04/15 07:18 PM
10/04/15 07:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Hey Boco can you Canuks even use foot holds on dry land any more?


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5218401
10/04/15 07:25 PM
10/04/15 07:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
Nothing stopping anyone if they are dumb enough to put up with that aggravation,lol.I learned they were no good here years ago,they kept getting froze down,snowed under,or when you caught something it was alive,You had to check them too often or the animal would escape,or die a slow death,and wreck itself struggling for days,and you had to waste time killing it ,then try to remake a set,in frozen ground covered in (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) and (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman),Covered in pitch,mud and blood from shooting,etc causing way more work in the fur shed,Heavy to haul around etc.
No good for nothing here.Way better to hang snares or set rotating jaw traps in this country then just go around and pick up the fur.
I realise you guys are stuck with them cause of your restrictive regs on snaring and bodygrips.
I guess they work good where there is no winter.

Last edited by Boco; 10/04/15 07:38 PM.

Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Boco] #5218436
10/04/15 07:49 PM
10/04/15 07:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,374
PA
Coon Duke Offline
trapper
Coon Duke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,374
PA
Here's the deal on the MB550...

Everyone can argue the catch efficiency, holding power, paw damage theories till they are blue in the face.

Here is a fact - the MB550 is extremely hard to repair for trapper working farm country where truck and machinery drive overs are common. This is coming from a guy who has repaired in the range of 200 bent up traps that have been driven over.

This is all due to the use of total cast jaw.

I often thought to myself that a trap with a standard base and standard steel jaws with bolt on cast "jaw faces" would make for a superior design. Similar to how rubber jawed traps are constructed.


~ PTA Life #482 - FTA - NTA ~

https://tstrapline.com/

https://youtube.com/@toddstrohecker
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Coon Duke] #5218454
10/04/15 08:00 PM
10/04/15 08:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Originally Posted By: Coon Duke
Here's the deal on the MB550...

Everyone can argue the catch efficiency, holding power, paw damage theories till they are blue in the face.

Here is a fact - the MB550 is extremely hard to repair for trapper working farm country where truck and machinery drive overs are common. This is coming from a guy who has repaired in the range of 200 bent up traps that have been driven over.

This is all due to the use of total cast jaw.

I often thought to myself that a trap with a standard base and standard steel jaws with bolt on cast "jaw faces" would make for a superior design. Similar to how rubber jawed traps are constructed.

So this design would have bolts running through the jaws?


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: 2cylinder] #5218459
10/04/15 08:05 PM
10/04/15 08:05 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,374
PA
Coon Duke Offline
trapper
Coon Duke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,374
PA
Yeah...like a rubber jaw.

Who knows if it would even work, but it is something to think about.


~ PTA Life #482 - FTA - NTA ~

https://tstrapline.com/

https://youtube.com/@toddstrohecker
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Coon Duke] #5218468
10/04/15 08:09 PM
10/04/15 08:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
That concept is very interesting sir.


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5218473
10/04/15 08:14 PM
10/04/15 08:14 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Duke , maybe a old fashion jaw post like newhouse would be in order?
Change out and go.


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5218509
10/04/15 08:40 PM
10/04/15 08:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
C
coon grease Offline
trapper
coon grease  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 395
2b 2d Pa.
Originally Posted By: coon grease
Does anyone know one of the top numbers men who uses 550's?
How about anyone who has to catch or kill predators for a living , who relies on 550's?



Sigh....... still waiting.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: coon grease] #5218518
10/04/15 08:44 PM
10/04/15 08:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Originally Posted By: coon grease
Originally Posted By: coon grease
Does anyone know one of the top numbers men who uses 550's?
How about anyone who has to catch or kill predators for a living , who relies on 550's?



Sigh....... still waiting.

You sound like the kind of person I want to meet, you keep pushing the subject when it's almost dead.


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: The Beav] #5219043
10/05/15 09:25 AM
10/05/15 09:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,136
southern ontario canada
C
coonwild Offline
trapper
coonwild  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,136
southern ontario canada
Originally Posted By: The Beav
Hey Boco can you Canuks even use foot holds on dry land any more?


Yes beav we can


Duncan Wildlife control your solution to wildlife problems


my video's: http://www.youtube.com/trappermatt1976

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219333
10/05/15 03:24 PM
10/05/15 03:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Having used most traps out there, and (like most of us did) starting with the 1.75s for coyotes what is the benefit of using a 1.75..or even a #2 sized trap for coyotes? I have found none, personally.

Some will say "less damage". In theory this "sounds" great. But in reality it is most often times the exact opposite. My 650s casts cause less damage than the 1.75s or 550s do. I've compared them side by side.

Now I know Beav has done some live market trapping with laminated 1.75s. I kinda get that (to some degree). I also know a guy from indiana who live market traps with #3 victor padded jaws (2 coiled). I also understand that. But for fur trapping, I cannot see one advantage to a smaller trap as opposed to a #3 or above for coyotes.

Gas, trucks, and time is spendy. Going cheap on a trap is shooting yourself in the foot...or feet..and head.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219441
10/05/15 05:37 PM
10/05/15 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219456
10/05/15 06:03 PM
10/05/15 06:03 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



With smaller traps, it takes a bit of expertise to guide the paw to the pan (fencing) vs. having a bigger target and hoping that the paw lands square. I sold all my 1.75/2/3's at the NTA in Marshfield a few years abck as they are obsolete compared to new trap designs. That being said, I don't like working on traps so these were stock models with beefier swivels and chain and night latched but no lamination.

If you're hoping that the animal's paw will land square, use a #78 cool

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5219894
10/05/15 09:54 PM
10/05/15 09:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Bob
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


Bob - you must have sissy house cats ..lol. 90% of my land are # 3's ..never seen damage!!!


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5219976
10/05/15 10:30 PM
10/05/15 10:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: Bob
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


Theory. I've caught farm cats in the big traps. More damage with the smaller ones by comparison. Of course the particular big trap could be different. Always had more damage in the smaller traps, though. Worse was always the 1.75s.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220061
10/05/15 11:13 PM
10/05/15 11:13 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Smaller trap offer the following advantages;

1. Quicker to set with less bedding required
2. Use less covering such as waxed dirt, etc. means less $$ spent if purchasing covering
3. Easier on the body if you are running dozens of sets every day
4. Less weight in the rig (esp. important in UTV/AtVs.
5. Less weight on the smaller species paw can be beneficial
6. Faster to get into the ground means less human scent left at the set area
7. MUCH easier to use and discuss with land owners in urban America

Just some quick points and there are more. I note also the bigger traps are valuable also and have their place.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220073
10/05/15 11:19 PM
10/05/15 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Bottom line for me, I sold all my MB 550's...I Do not like them . That's all I got to say about that smile

Last edited by TNcat; 10/06/15 01:03 PM.

IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220118
10/06/15 12:05 AM
10/06/15 12:05 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



I think the take away here is;

Trappers have opinions based on their individual trapping skills and observations in the field. Both of these criteria vary trapper to trapper so trap preference varies trapper to trapper. That's a good thing. Some like Coke and some prefer Pepsi.

There's really no "right" or "wrong" answer. Buy some of several models and see what your style of trapping click with.

I started trapping with jump traps, moved on to Victor #3N, then to Victor #3's, then to Victor #2 (not very long) then to SC 1.75, now MB 550. There were BMI Wolfer and some high end traps (Jakes, Sterling) used in the west but not in Michigan as theft was too severe (10% stolen each year). All have caught coyotes and some are much better than others and some would be better used in rural settings vs. suburban surroundings.

Aren't we fortunate to be able to discuss several brands of traps and several styles as well. That way each of us can find a good "fit".

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220120
10/06/15 12:06 AM
10/06/15 12:06 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions?

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220504
10/06/15 11:33 AM
10/06/15 11:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,856
Pa
W
Wright Brothers Online content
trapper
Wright Brothers  Online Content
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,856
Pa
If bigger is more friendly, why then does my state association provide 1 1/2s to the trapper school attendees? Is the whole Association misinformed? lol

So many variables, if on the magic coyote run way yes set big. But, does the newbie asking these questions even know where this location exists?
Experienced guys don't need to ask. I'm not about to suggest new trappers, IN MY AREA IN THE EAST, start big.





Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: ] #5220508
10/06/15 11:36 AM
10/06/15 11:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Originally Posted By: Mark June
When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions?

#1 longspring


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220574
10/06/15 01:10 PM
10/06/15 01:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about.

Last edited by Bob; 10/06/15 01:28 PM.

"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220576
10/06/15 01:13 PM
10/06/15 01:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Beaver trapper, did you ever decide on a trap?


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5220824
10/06/15 05:33 PM
10/06/15 05:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: Bob
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about.


It depends on what #3, Bob. Of course they run the spectrum.

I trap in suburbia...with 650 casts because the 550s beat the non targets up too much.

I keep some 2 coil Victor #3 padded jaws for places of extra concern.

Just my experience. To each his own.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220903
10/06/15 06:50 PM
10/06/15 06:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,106
Near Gardiner MT
E
Elkguy Offline
trapper
Elkguy  Offline
trapper
E

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,106
Near Gardiner MT
Caught a fox in a 4 1/2 Newhouse a couple years ago. Would have to categorize the damage as "extreme". Guess I didn't have that pan tension quite up to the mandated 10 lbs. Anyway, I wouldn't recommend this type of trap for coyote/fox. smile


CBCS
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220977
10/06/15 07:32 PM
10/06/15 07:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
Calvin, I'm talking kit fox, not reds or greys. Out here we have swift fox, they're protected, but nearly the same thing as a kit fox. Where I grew up we had kit fox. I've caught them in fully modified bridger #3s and they cause devastating damage. There is no chance of release when a kit or swift fox is caught in a #3. There's no recovering from that for them, their legs are very fragile.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221047
10/06/15 08:09 PM
10/06/15 08:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Point taken, Bob. We Don't have Kit fox here...and really not much of a fox population at all anymore (unfortunately). I do release a couple reds every year, though...after I check their feet as best I can. I Can't find it to kill them anymore. If the coyotes beat me to them in the trap, they tear them in half...literally. A hunk of fox down the hole guarantees a coyote or two there the next day, however.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221108
10/06/15 08:48 PM
10/06/15 08:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 36
Hillsboro Ohio
J
Jeffrey D Norris Offline
trapper
Jeffrey D Norris  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 36
Hillsboro Ohio
Guys, I don't think that a half an inch of jaw width is going to gain a whole lot on the catch gain...I think a lot of the strong traps have a greater jaw pressure... Has anyone ever tested the pressure of grip each trap has ??? I like the softcatch trap for a couple reasons... 1st thing is a broken leg will twist off pretty easy (softcatch is a little easier on the leg)... 2nd is I will be trying to sell live this year... and the rubber jaw also has a greater holding area ... I guess there are a lot of choices out there like several have posted... That is my take on trap selection use what catches for you and forget what don't


I caught 1 low down dirty rat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221219
10/06/15 10:05 PM
10/06/15 10:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Lack of Swivels is the cause not the traps , power is not the issue. In 3 traps listed.


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221257
10/06/15 10:32 PM
10/06/15 10:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Well said.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221292
10/06/15 10:56 PM
10/06/15 10:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,561
Northern MN
Dale Torma Offline
trapper
Dale Torma  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,561
Northern MN
Using 1.75 size traps has the great advantage of wolves self releasing, most times anyway.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221423
10/07/15 04:42 AM
10/07/15 04:42 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
A
Andrew N. Offline
trapper
Andrew N.  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
Did mr. june quit trapperman?

Just read about it on another thread. Congrats coon grease. looks like you won't be satisfied until all the pro's are gone. Small, small person you are.

Last edited by Andrew N.; 10/07/15 04:51 AM.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: red mt] #5221436
10/07/15 05:57 AM
10/07/15 05:57 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 184
ohio
B
Buddy Norris Offline
trapper
Buddy Norris  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 184
ohio
Originally Posted By: red mt
Lack of Swivels is the cause not the traps , power is not the issue. In 3 traps listed.


Swivels are the key and short chains.

We have been all over the map on this thread,but the original question was the best yote trap . Not multi purpose trap. I love the 550 and I see no reason to bash the other 2 choices mentioned or the users of them.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Andrew N.] #5221576
10/07/15 09:45 AM
10/07/15 09:45 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 18
Iowa
4
4GIRLS Offline
trapper
4GIRLS  Offline
trapper
4

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 18
Iowa
Andrew N., I just did a User List search for Mark June and he is no longer listed as a member. SAD! When you have an expert, biologist, life-long trapper run off by some hill-jack that couldn't carry Mark's trappers bag! Well done!

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: red mt] #5221601
10/07/15 10:10 AM
10/07/15 10:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,964
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: red mt
Lack of Swivels is the cause not the traps , power is not the issue. In 3 traps listed.


The Traps I've tested always have the same chain/swivel setup. I've virtually run the same chain/swivel setup since the 80s. Traps do vary.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221700
10/07/15 11:47 AM
10/07/15 11:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Well that's to bad but If you can't stand the heat.
I know Mark and He Is a stand up guy and he's been around for awhile.

I may be wrong but I just think being a trapping supply dealer and posting on a trapping forum may be a bit of a conflict of interest. You don't see Clint lockleer or Tim Caven or for that matter Mr Dobbins Or Mr lennon getting all involved In these posts.
Like I said I may be wrong In that line of thinking but that's how I feel.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221771
10/07/15 01:08 PM
10/07/15 01:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
I agree Beav , his subtle jab's wasn't helping his business..JMO

Last edited by TNcat; 10/07/15 06:31 PM.

IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221808
10/07/15 01:50 PM
10/07/15 01:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
How do you get chased off trapperman,I thought you had to be kicked off.
Seems kind of wimpy.

Last edited by Boco; 10/07/15 01:51 PM.

Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221815
10/07/15 02:02 PM
10/07/15 02:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
No you can quit if It gets to hot. LOL


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221849
10/07/15 02:24 PM
10/07/15 02:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
This all reminds me of trying to heard house cats. Or a bunch of gossiping children. It's ashame that someone with vast knowledge is not appreciated and RESPECTED by his peers. If you all were such great trappers you would be out scouting or gaining more permission, etc.etc. As for me I have an appointment with a man that owns 6,000 acres and then a meeting with the road commission to verify my contract for beaver control. If you mission is to ruin Tman then have at it!

over and out


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221870
10/07/15 02:34 PM
10/07/15 02:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
A
Andrew N. Offline
trapper
Andrew N.  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,748
Nevada
He told paul guys like hobbie trapper and coon grease ran him off. I hope hobbie trapper and coon grease gain a ton of experience they'll need to fill the hole mark left with his knowledge and experience for all the new guys wanting to learn. On the other hand they may not care about passing on info or helping people out. They only want to be RIGHT in any stupid argument.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221913
10/07/15 03:05 PM
10/07/15 03:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
At the end of this, mark is gone. So let's get over this and move on to next subject. We aren't even talking about traps anymore.


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221940
10/07/15 03:24 PM
10/07/15 03:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
Ok
When WI was trapping and collaring wolves back about 100 years ago they went to using #14s with teeth. they had less foot damage with traps with teeth then traps with out.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222322
10/07/15 08:47 PM
10/07/15 08:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
2 TRAPS Offline
trapper
2 TRAPS  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
Were is data to support that statement Beav? Mark will be missed he is a world of knowledge.


HMC Mfg.
B.E.K TRAP TAG
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222334
10/07/15 08:56 PM
10/07/15 08:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,519
james bay frontierOnt.
If I'm not mistaken that guy sells his "knowledge".
Why would he give it out for free on here?


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222386
10/07/15 09:19 PM
10/07/15 09:19 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
2 TRAPS Offline
trapper
2 TRAPS  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
Good point. But he always did. Shows what kind guy he is.


HMC Mfg.
B.E.K TRAP TAG
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: 2 TRAPS] #5222387
10/07/15 09:19 PM
10/07/15 09:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Originally Posted By: 2 TRAPS
Were is data to support that statement Beav? Mark will be missed he is a world of knowledge.

Look at some US wildlife agencies reports jaguar collaring program . MT. Uses Lpc 7 for collaring wolves here rubberized teeth . Gov. Trappers use mb750 with nobs welded in them here when asked to collar wolves in montana.
Might look at Livestock protection Company I believe they have some stuff interest for you 2 traps


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222577
10/08/15 12:11 AM
10/08/15 12:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,561
Northern MN
Dale Torma Offline
trapper
Dale Torma  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,561
Northern MN
Toothed traps were used for research with good results until recently . The teeth served two purposes ,they let the liquid drain and reduced edema, and the feet don't slide from side to side and get cut . Thus the trapped wolf has a better, healthier foot.
I believe the researchers went to rubber jaws, but I bet they will go back to teeth, rubber jaws wrap around and stop circulation.
Sometimes old technology is best. And us trappers don't know anything. Lol

14 Newhouse are offset with teeth. Perfect wolf trap for Midwest wolves. Maybe small for Alaska type wolves.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: 4GIRLS] #5222685
10/08/15 07:31 AM
10/08/15 07:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,738
North Missouri
L
longbow31 Offline
trapper
longbow31  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,738
North Missouri
Originally Posted By: 4GIRLS
Andrew N., I just did a User List search for Mark June and he is no longer listed as a member. SAD! When you have an expert, biologist, life-long trapper run off by some hill-jack that couldn't carry Mark's trappers bag! Well done!

that sucks. really liked Mr. June. pretty soon there will be about 2 know-it-alls left on here. getting pretty bad as it is.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222770
10/08/15 08:55 AM
10/08/15 08:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
T
The Beav Online content
trapper
The Beav  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,851
Wisconsin
The 14s don't have sharp teeth they are very blunt and kept the foot from sliding. I don't have access to the WI wolf studies but that's what I was told from the persons doing the trapping.


The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222797
10/08/15 09:32 AM
10/08/15 09:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076
Maine
M
mainer Offline
trapper
mainer  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076
Maine
The "right trap" for any species depends on the methods used to catch that particular animal, and method depends on geographical location, climate, etc. As Mark pointed out, it's all about variables, and when those variables come together harmoniously you've got a formula for success.

So arguing about which trap is best for coyotes in isolation, without taking into consideration the methods used to catch those (particular) coyotes, is not very productive. I think you'll find that those who use very different sized traps for the same species, and are successful, will employ different methods based on their own set of conditions - aka variables.

Anyway, I hope Mark returns. I've never used his lures before, but I will now. I think his honest engagement with fellow trappers here and elsewhere boosts his credibility, and I appreciate that. Thank you, Mark!


"...in a very few days we succeeded in taking over one hundred beaver, the skins of which were worth ten dollars per pound."
Jim Beckwourth (1856)
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222839
10/08/15 10:11 AM
10/08/15 10:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
2 TRAPS Offline
trapper
2 TRAPS  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
Makes since Beav. Information like that should be available to show antis


HMC Mfg.
B.E.K TRAP TAG
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5222891
10/08/15 11:06 AM
10/08/15 11:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
Taximan Offline
trapper
Taximan  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,459
Montana
It is mentioned in this Trapper's Post article,regarding the LPC #7 which they describe as a modern version of the Newhouse #14.
http://www.trapperspost.com/archive2.html

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5223020
10/08/15 01:02 PM
10/08/15 01:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 72
west texas
E
eyedoc Offline
trapper
eyedoc  Offline
trapper
E

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 72
west texas
good post Mainer, last week during some of Mark's bashing, i ordered another dozen mb 550s and alot of his lures/bait from him, even though he's in state and i now pay state sales tax when ordering from him, he's a great person to have out there for the trapping community, sad to see him gone

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5223050
10/08/15 01:34 PM
10/08/15 01:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Thanks taxi could not remember where it was.


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5223313
10/08/15 05:56 PM
10/08/15 05:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 959
PA
M
mmtrapper Offline
trapper
mmtrapper  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 959
PA
I am reading a lot about paw damage on yote's , but my question is unless your catching them for the live market why does it matter really ?

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: mmtrapper] #5223322
10/08/15 06:04 PM
10/08/15 06:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Public perseption, and they don't seem to fight as hard!


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5223845
10/08/15 11:13 PM
10/08/15 11:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
Mmtrapper....because some of us actually care about the comfort and well being of the animal. Even if we're gonna kill it in the end, we owe it to the coyote to make it as painless as possible. I don't know about the rest of you, but when I see a critter with a messed up paw it upsets me. I don't want to cause an animal unnecessary pain.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5223847
10/08/15 11:16 PM
10/08/15 11:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
2 TRAPS Offline
trapper
2 TRAPS  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,825
Bland Virginia
I with Bob. But there are times that some things can not be controlled that cause foot damage. You just gota get experience and do the best you can.


HMC Mfg.
B.E.K TRAP TAG
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5224067
10/09/15 07:34 AM
10/09/15 07:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,630
Ohio, 55yrs old
Pasadena Offline
trapper
Pasadena  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,630
Ohio, 55yrs old
Originally Posted By: Bob
Mmtrapper....because some of us actually care about the comfort and well being of the animal. Even if we're gonna kill it in the end, we owe it to the coyote to make it as painless as possible. I don't know about the rest of you, but when I see a critter with a messed up paw it upsets me. I don't want to cause an animal unnecessary pain.


I've said this many times on threads like this one. Call me soft or what you will but I too hate to see any animal I catch with any undo damage caused by something maybe I could have prevented.


[Linked Image]


Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #6157923
02/14/18 05:32 PM
02/14/18 05:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 57
NEW HAMPSHIRE
D
DERRYNHTRAPPERJO Offline
trapper
DERRYNHTRAPPERJO  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 57
NEW HAMPSHIRE
I have dozens of montgomery #2,and #3's. I also have a dozen victor#3 old square jaws. I love them all for coyotes. The victors seem to struggle a bit when staked down. On a drag with 10' of chain they are great! If anyone could help post a few pics for me i can show you a bunch of catches with both.


1st Cav div. 93-97 19k20
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #6157966
02/14/18 06:24 PM
02/14/18 06:24 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Wisconsin
D
Dakota75 Offline
trapper
Dakota75  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 39
Wisconsin
I’m sold on the MB550. Set this trap last Monday. Received 7” of snow on Friday and 5 more on Sunday. Trap fired thru 12” and had perfect catch. First year trapping. I only have 9 MB550 and have caught 19 yotes. Haven’t had a single pullout or foot damage.



Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: mainer] #6158018
02/14/18 07:17 PM
02/14/18 07:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
T
trappergbus Offline
trapper
trappergbus  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,445
Southern Michigan
Originally Posted By: mainer
The "right trap" for any species depends on the methods used to catch that particular animal, and method depends on geographical location, climate, etc. As Mark pointed out, it's all about variables, and when those variables come together harmoniously you've got a formula for success.

So arguing about which trap is best for coyotes in isolation, without taking into consideration the methods used to catch those (particular) coyotes, is not very productive. I think you'll find that those who use very different sized traps for the same species, and are successful, will employ different methods based on their own set of conditions - aka variables.

Anyway, I hope Mark returns. I've never used his lures before, but I will now. I think his honest engagement with fellow trappers here and elsewhere boosts his credibility, and I appreciate that. Thank you, Mark!

My thoughts exactly! Very well put!


Common sense catches alot of fur..
Pay homage to all you harvest..
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #6162335
02/19/18 04:50 AM
02/19/18 04:50 AM
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,276
NWT
Ryan McLeod Offline
trapper
Ryan McLeod  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,276
NWT
Somebody send me 6 of each so i can test them and post my opinion:) I use #3 victor softcatch right now for lynx, red fox and occasional wolverine. Checking out the #3 and #4 victor offset forged jaw. They look like they would work well up here. Has anybody switched the softcatch jaws out for the offset jaws? Cheaper than buying new traps.


If you take care of the land the land will take care of you
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Ryan McLeod] #6162340
02/19/18 05:53 AM
02/19/18 05:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Originally Posted By: Ryan McLeod
Somebody send me 6 of each so i can test them and post my opinion:) I use #3 victor softcatch right now for lynx, red fox and occasional wolverine. Checking out the #3 and #4 victor offset forged jaw. They look like they would work well up here. Has anybody switched the softcatch jaws out for the offset jaws? Cheaper than buying new traps.

Little insomnia going on here but lol,
I use the victor offset forge jaw in the 3and 4s in a dog less versions or they are called victor Monty's. Been using them since they came out.
On coyotes ,cats, like them so well in coyotes that's all I use.feet are good and you like the lockup better than on your soft catch version I am willing to bet.
Caught and held of wolves in them .


Kenneth schoening
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #7170936
02/06/21 04:58 AM
02/06/21 04:58 AM
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,897
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,897
Amite county Mississippi
Ttt

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  Drifter, Wolfdog91 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1