Raccoons averaged $13.41. In 1978 I averaged $40.60. You cannot make gas mileage for 13 bucks and change. Quit killing coons!
Paul, I'm a bit surprised that you view fur trapping as a money-making endeavor. Sure, I've had some great years (economics) fur trapping, but it's usually a break-even or trap at a loss hobby. Again, WCO work and fur trapping are 2 different worlds. Fur trappers are USUALLY hobby trappers and do so for recreational reasons. They simply love it. No different than duck hunting. Ducks do not taste THAT good, to stand in a blind all day in 20 degree temps and sleet.
I will admit there are fur trappers who only trap when prices are high, but more that do it because they enjoy it. If they make a little money, that's good, but if they don't, that's just as good. I've trapped muskrats by the hundreds whether they were 10 bucks or $1.50. Never miss a year. DNR sets season dates (typically with no limits) to insure enough can be harvested to help minimize property damages and keep the populations stable/healthy. Muskrats don't care (or know) if they are worth a buck or 12 bucks... they still destroy dams, levees and shorelines just the same. They need thinned out, and not just so someone can make money at it.
About 10 years ago or so, coons dropped from 25 bucks one year to around 8 bucks. A huge number of trappers and coon hunters quit going, as they were spoiled by the high dollars from the previous year. For a while I was releasing all the medium and small coons that year, until I talked with a biologist from DNR. He got on me for not thinning the population down. Serious predation on ground-nesting birds and disease were the reasons they extended season on many species. He told me to shoot them and let them lay.... NOT to release them. Coon harvests in the 70's and 80's were about 350,000 per year in Illinois (trapping and hunting). When prices crashed in '87, the harvest dropped to about 70,000. Of course that is a reason we (WCO's) are so busy, but with a limited harvest comes detrimental consequences (to a variety of species).
I've caught 300 to 400 muskrats per year (fur trapping) when they were less than 2 bucks. Didn't care. I love doing it, and it DOES NOT hurt the numbers if habitat is available. I'm out trapping every day right now, and prices are poor. 6 bucks for coons (on carcass), 6 for rats, 8 for mink, 8 to 10 for beavers. No way I'm going to break even, but I'll keep going anyway. I can turn off my WCO mentality when fur trapping. Just as I turn off my fur trapping mindset when doing commercial wildlife control.
I trap animals and solve animal problems all year long for a living, and my "weekend" is December and January. So to "relax" after catching animals all spring, summer and fall, I go catch animals.... but on a different level. Don't have to "catch them all" at any site. Can go where I want, when I want. And helping landowners by being part of the "old school" trapping tradition. I sell my catch on carcass to a local fur buyer who has a contract with with a pet food company in St. Louis. Nothing is wasted. And it makes me feel great when an anti-trapper (while holding their little dog that is "part of the family") tells me they hate trapping (and yes, trappers). I simply let them know their little fur ball eats the meat and by-products from the critters I catch.... then they don't know what to say.
Getting off-topic.... but fur trapping is such a tradition in so many areas that the die-hard guys would be doing it even if the animals had NO value (myself included). To view every aspect of interacting with Nature and wildlife through an economic standpoint seems a bit narrow-minded. Just sayin'.
BTW.... Was a state trapper education instructor for 15 years, and still constantly take kids (and adults) out trapping to introduce them to the activity.